Resolve table layout in Dependency Scanning page
What does this MR do?
The layout of the analyzers table on the Dependency Scanning page makes it difficult to read. Of its four columns, only three are visible by default. You have to scroll horizontally to see the fourth.
Related issues
N/A
Author's checklist
-
Follow the Documentation Guidelines and Style Guide. -
Ensure that the product tier badge is added to doc's h1
. -
Request a review based on the documentation page's metadata and associated Technical Writer.
To avoid having this MR be added to code verification QA issues, don't add these labels: feature, frontend, backend, ~"bug", or database
Review checklist
Documentation-related MRs should be reviewed by a Technical Writer for a non-blocking review, based on Documentation Guidelines and the Style Guide.
-
If the content requires it, ensure the information is reviewed by a subject matter expert. - Technical writer review items:
-
Ensure docs metadata is present and up-to-date. -
Ensure the appropriate labels are added to this MR. - If relevant to this MR, ensure content topic type principles are in use, including:
-
The headings should be something you'd do a Google search for. Instead of Default behavior
, say something likeDefault behavior when you close an issue
. -
The headings (other than the page title) should be active. Instead of Configuring GDK
, say something likeConfigure GDK
. -
Any task steps should be written as a numbered list. - If the content still needs to be edited for topic types, you can create a follow-up issue with the docs-technical-debt label.
-
-
-
Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the above reviews. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review. -
Ensure a release milestone is set.
Edited by Russell Dickenson