Respect absolute date user setting in MR widget

What does this MR do?

The MR Widget is not respecting the absolute date user setting because it utilizes timeago.js directly rather than our timeago utility function. Adjusting it to use our utility fixes it.

Screenshots or Screencasts (strongly suggested)

Before	After

Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

Conformity

• I have included changelog trailers, or none are needed. (Does this MR need a changelog?)
• I have added/updated documentation, or it's not needed. (Is documentation required?)
• I have properly separated EE content from FOSS, or this MR is FOSS only. (Where should EE code go?)
• I have added information for database reviewers in the MR description, or it's not needed. (Does this MR have database related changes?)
• I have self-reviewed this MR per code review guidelines.
• This MR does not harm performance, or I have asked a reviewer to help assess the performance impact. (Merge request performance guidelines)
• I have followed the style guides.
• This change is backwards compatible across updates, or this does not apply.

Availability and Testing

• I have added/updated tests following the Testing Guide, or it's not needed. (Consider all test levels. See the Test Planning Process.)
• I have tested this MR in all supported browsers, or it's not needed.
• I have informed the Infrastructure department of a default or new setting change per definition of done, or it's not needed.

Security

Does this MR contain changes to processing or storing of credentials or tokens, authorization and authentication methods or other items described in the security review guidelines? If not, then delete this Security section.

• Label as security and @ mention @gitlab-com/gl-security/appsec
• The MR includes necessary changes to maintain consistency between UI, API, email, or other methods
• Security reports checked/validated by a reviewer from the AppSec team

assigned to @leipert

changed the description

changed milestone to %14.1

added frontend typemaintenance labels

added typefeature label

mentioned in issue #14560 (closed)

	1 Warning
	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the tooling, ~"tooling::pipelines", ~"tooling::workflow", documentation, QA labels.

	1 Message
	CHANGELOG missing: If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab FOSS, add the Changelog trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog. If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab EE, also add the EE: true trailer to your commit message. If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	Florie Guibert (@fguibert) (UTC+10, 8 hours ahead of @leipert)	Jacques Erasmus (@jerasmus) (UTC+2, same timezone as @leipert)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

@jannik_lehmann Could you do the initial review?

requested review from @jannik_lehmann

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits a8407791 and 128be7d9

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	3.08 MB	3.08 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	1.84 MB	1.84 MB	-	0.0 %

---

Please look at the full report for more details

---

Read more about how this report works.

Generated by Danger

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report for 128be7d9!

review-qa-smoke: test report

@leipert Changes look good to me! Since this includes userfacing-changes I think this should have a Changelog Footer in the Commit Message. WDYT?

Docs: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/changelog.html

requested review from @jerasmus

approved this merge request

Setting label ~"group::ecosystem" based on @leipert's group.

added groupecosystem [DEPRECATED] label

Setting label(s) devopscreate sectiondev based on ~"group::ecosystem".

added devopscreate sectiondev labels

approved this merge request

resolved all threads

merged

mentioned in commit 983fe9da

added workflowstaging label

added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging label

added workflowproduction label and removed workflowcanary label

added releasedcandidate label

added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label

added 1 deleted label and removed devopscreate label

removed typefeature label

added devopsmanage label and removed 1 deleted label