Skip to content

Add label_applied and scope to Issuable Sla

Sean Arnold requested to merge 335008-add-label-applied-to-issuable-sla into master

What does this MR do?

This MR adds a new column, label_applied, to the IssuableSla model. This is used to mark that a label (Exceeded SLA) label has been applied to the related issue.

We use this boolean column to avoid enqueuing needless jobs in the IncidentManagement::IncidentSlaExceededCheckWorker. Previously, if the issue/incident was still open we would enqueue a job to add a SLA label even if the label had been applied already.

DB Migration

Up:

== 20210712052519 AddLabelAppliedIssuableClosedToIssuableSla: migrating =======
-- add_column(:issuable_slas, :label_applied, :boolean, {:default=>false, :null=>false})
   -> 0.0092s
-- add_column(:issuable_slas, :issuable_closed, :boolean, {:default=>false, :null=>false})
   -> 0.0016s
== 20210712052519 AddLabelAppliedIssuableClosedToIssuableSla: migrated (0.0109s)

== 20210714043818 AddIndexForLabelAppliedToIssuableSla: migrating =============
-- transaction_open?()
   -> 0.0000s
-- index_exists?(:issuable_slas, :due_at, {:name=>"index_issuable_slas_on_due_at_label_applied", :where=>"label_applied = FALSE", :algorithm=>:concurrently})
   -> 0.0039s
-- execute("SET statement_timeout TO 0")
   -> 0.0005s
-- add_index(:issuable_slas, :due_at, {:name=>"index_issuable_slas_on_due_at_label_applied", :where=>"label_applied = FALSE", :algorithm=>:concurrently})
   -> 0.0193s
-- execute("RESET ALL")
   -> 0.0007s
== 20210714043818 AddIndexForLabelAppliedToIssuableSla: migrated (0.0252s) ====

Post Migration:

== 20210722042939 UpdateIssuableSlasWhereIssueClosed: migrating ===============
-- execute("UPDATE issuable_slas SET issuable_closed = TRUE WHERE issuable_slas.id IN (SELECT issuable_slas.id FROM issuable_slas INNER JOIN issues ON issues.id = issuable_slas.issue_id WHERE (issues.state_id IN (2)))")
   -> 0.0258s
== 20210722042939 UpdateIssuableSlasWhereIssueClosed: migrated (0.0259s) ======

Down:

== 20210712052519 AddLabelAppliedIssuableClosedToIssuableSla: reverting =======
-- remove_column(:issuable_slas, :issuable_closed, :boolean, {:default=>false, :null=>false})
   -> 0.0170s
-- remove_column(:issuable_slas, :label_applied, :boolean, {:default=>false, :null=>false})
   -> 0.0010s
== 20210712052519 AddLabelAppliedIssuableClosedToIssuableSla: reverted (0.0203s)

== 20210714043818 AddIndexForLabelAppliedToIssuableSla: reverting =============
-- transaction_open?()
   -> 0.0000s
-- indexes(:issuable_slas)
   -> 0.0030s
-- execute("SET statement_timeout TO 0")
   -> 0.0005s
-- remove_index(:issuable_slas, {:algorithm=>:concurrently, :name=>"index_issuable_slas_on_id_due_at_label_applied"})
   -> 0.0065s
-- execute("RESET ALL")
   -> 0.0005s
== 20210714043818 AddIndexForLabelAppliedToIssuableSla: reverted (0.0114s) ====

Post migration (no-op):
== 20210722042939 UpdateIssuableSlasWhereIssueClosed: reverting ===============
== 20210722042939 UpdateIssuableSlasWhereIssueClosed: reverted (0.0000s) ======
Queries used in worker
Post-migration query with plans
Generate test data
ALTER TABLE "issuable_slas" ADD "label_applied" boolean DEFAULT FALSE NOT NULL
ALTER TABLE "issuable_slas" ADD "issuable_closed" boolean DEFAULT FALSE NOT NULL

exec CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY "index_issuable_slas_on_due_at_id_label_applied_issuable_closed" ON "issuable_slas" ("due_at", "id") WHERE label_applied = FALSE AND issuable_closed = FALSE;

INSERT INTO
  issuable_slas (issue_id, due_at, label_applied, issuable_closed)
SELECT
  id, NOW() - INTERVAL '60 days' + (random() * (INTERVAL '90 days')), (round(random()) :: int) :: boolean, (round(random()) :: int) :: boolean
FROM
  issues
WHERE
  id > (
    SELECT
      id
    FROM
      issues
    ORDER BY
      id DESC OFFSET 20000
    LIMIT
      1
  );

Screenshots or Screencasts (strongly suggested)

Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

Conformity

Availability and Testing

Security

Does this MR contain changes to processing or storing of credentials or tokens, authorization and authentication methods or other items described in the security review guidelines? If not, then delete this Security section.

  • Label as security and @ mention @gitlab-com/gl-security/appsec
  • The MR includes necessary changes to maintain consistency between UI, API, email, or other methods
  • Security reports checked/validated by a reviewer from the AppSec team

Related to #335008 (closed)

Edited by Sean Arnold

Merge request reports