Skip to content

GitLab Next

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
GitLab GitLab
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Locked Files
  • Issues 38,038
    • Issues 38,038
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
  • Merge requests 1,345
    • Merge requests 1,345
  • Requirements
    • Requirements
    • List
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Test Cases
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Metrics
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI/CD
    • Code Review
    • Insights
    • Issue
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • GitLab.org
  • GitLabGitLab
  • Merge requests
  • !6448

Merged
Created Jul 10, 2018 by Mark Chao@lulalalaMaintainer11 of 16 tasks completed11/16 tasks

Add date fields to Epic to enable dates to source from milestones

  • Overview 132
  • Commits 54
  • Pipelines 39
  • Changes 41

The CE port is at https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/20687

What does this MR do?

Allow obtaining an epic's start/due dates based on its issues' milestones.

Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Why was this MR needed?

Allow setting/updating dates automatically so users don't have to. Backend part of #6470 (closed)

Screenshots (if relevant)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoyygR0_33w&feature=youtu.be

Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

  • Changelog entry added, if necessary
  • Documentation created/updated
  • API support added
  • Tests added for this feature/bug
  • Conform by the code review guidelines
    • Has been reviewed by a UX Designer
    • Has been reviewed by a Frontend maintainer
    • Has been reviewed by a Backend maintainer
    • Has been reviewed by a Database specialist
  • EE specific content should be in the top level /ee folder
  • Conform by the merge request performance guides
  • Conform by the style guides
  • Conform by the database guides
  • If you have multiple commits, please combine them into a few logically organized commits by squashing them
  • Internationalization required/considered
  • If paid feature, have we considered GitLab.com plan and how it works for groups and is there a design for promoting it to users who aren't on the correct plan
  • End-to-end tests pass (package-and-qa manual pipeline job)

What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #6470 (closed)

Design decisions

Since epic sorting is needed on the database level, the overall composite start/due date values need to be stored in the database. The existing start_date and end_date will act as this composite date.

Scenarios when this composite column needs to be updates

  • When epic _fixed and is_fixed are changed (Epics::UpdateService)
  • When issue is assigned/unassigned to epic (EpicIssues::CreateService, EpicIssues::DestroyService)
  • When issue milestone is changed (Issues::UpdateService)
  • When milestone dates are changed (Milestones::UpdateService)
Edited Aug 07, 2018 by Sean McGivern
Assignee
Assign to
Reviewer
Request review from
11.2
Milestone
11.2 (Past due)
Assign milestone
Time tracking
Source branch: 6470-milestone-dates-integrated-into-epics