You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Geo Node Status 2.0 - Refactor Popovers
What does this MR do?
Closes #215630 (closed)
In the New Geo UI we use the geo-progress-bar for multiple types of data. However, the popovers in the component had hard coded labels. This isn't flexible enough for the data it represents. This adds props to allow for overriding of the labels where needed.
This change is also behind a feature flag (:geo_nodes_beta)
How to test
- Set up a Geo Primary/Secondary GDK
- Fetch the current branch
- Activate the Feature Flag on your Primary GDK (
:geo_nodes_beta) - Navigate to
http://127.0.0.1:3000/admin/geo/nodes_beta - View UI
Screenshots (strongly suggested)
| before | after | |
|---|---|---|
| Checksum |  |
 |
| Slots |  |
 |
| Sync |  |
 |
| Verification |  |
 |
Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
Conformity
-
I have included a changelog entry, or it's not needed. (Does this MR need a changelog?) -
I have added/updated documentation, or it's not needed. (Is documentation required?) -
I have properly separated EE content from FOSS, or this MR is FOSS only. (Where should EE code go?) - [-] I have added information for database reviewers in the MR description, or it's not needed. (Does this MR have database related changes?)
-
I have self-reviewed this MR per code review guidelines. -
This MR does not harm performance, or I have asked a reviewer to help assess the performance impact. (Merge request performance guidelines) -
I have followed the style guides.
Availability and Testing
-
I have added/updated tests following the Testing Guide, or it's not needed. (Consider all test levels. See the Test Planning Process.) -
I have tested this MR in all supported browsers, or it's not needed. - [-] I have informed the Infrastructure department of a default or new setting change per definition of done, or it's not needed.
Security
Does this MR contain changes to processing or storing of credentials or tokens, authorization and authentication methods or other items described in the security review guidelines? If not, then delete this Security section.
- [-] Label as security and @ mention
@gitlab-com/gl-security/appsec - [-] The MR includes necessary changes to maintain consistency between UI, API, email, or other methods
- [-] Security reports checked/validated by a reviewer from the AppSec team
Related to #215630 (closed)
Edited by David O'Regan