Show only open items with "in progress" VSA

What does this MR do?

This change alters the in_progress filter in Value Stream Analytics. When the in progress filter is given, the backend will only query the Issue and Merge Request records which are in opened state.

The change is not user facing, the filter is not used on the UI yet.

Database

See the query tab in the depesz link for the full query.

The difference between the old and new query is the extra state_id" IN (1) filter. The timings are cached timings. Uncached timings are <2s on PRD, the performance is slightly better with the new queries.

Issue query

• Old: https://explain.depesz.com/s/HqRW
• New: https://explain.depesz.com/s/uQDo

The new query reduces the number of rows a bit and uses an index that covers the state_id column.

MR query

• Old: https://explain.depesz.com/s/eOLl
• New: https://explain.depesz.com/s/5WkH

Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

Conformity

• I have included a changelog entry, or it's not needed. (Does this MR need a changelog?)
• I have added/updated documentation, or it's not needed. (Is documentation required?)
• I have properly separated EE content from FOSS, or this MR is FOSS only. (Where should EE code go?)
• I have added information for database reviewers in the MR description, or it's not needed. (Does this MR have database related changes?)
• I have self-reviewed this MR per code review guidelines.
• This MR does not harm performance, or I have asked a reviewer to help assess the performance impact. (Merge request performance guidelines)
• I have followed the style guides.

Availability and Testing

• I have added/updated tests following the Testing Guide, or it's not needed. (Consider all test levels. See the Test Planning Process.)
• I have tested this MR in all supported browsers, or it's not needed.
• I have informed the Infrastructure department of a default or new setting change per definition of done, or it's not needed.

Security

Does this MR contain changes to processing or storing of credentials or tokens, authorization and authentication methods or other items described in the security review guidelines? If not, then delete this Security section.

• Label as security and @ mention @gitlab-com/gl-security/appsec
• The MR includes necessary changes to maintain consistency between UI, API, email, or other methods
• Security reports checked/validated by a reviewer from the AppSec team

Related to #329620 (closed)