Improve geo docs based on geo demo on Dec 5
What does this MR do?
- Add better success step!
- Move configurable fields to the end of commands
- Add note that unhealthy node is expected
- Clarifies ambiguous use of the word server
- Update auto_migrate re-enable docs for clarity
- Replace use of interface address with private address
- Remove link to gitlab reconfigure docs
- Fix geo docs assumption of already running GitLab
Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Why was this MR needed?
Screenshots (if relevant)
Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
-
Changelog entry added, if necessary -
Documentation created/updated -
API support added -
Tests added for this feature/bug - Review
-
Has been reviewed by UX -
Has been reviewed by Frontend -
Has been reviewed by Backend -
Has been reviewed by Database
-
-
Conform by the merge request performance guides -
Conform by the style guides -
Squashed related commits together -
Internationalization required/considered -
If paid feature, have we considered GitLab.com plan and how it works for groups and is there a design for promoting it to users who aren't on the correct plan
What are the relevant issue numbers?
Edited by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖