Skip to content

Remove check for user being applicable codeowner

What does this MR do?

I mistakenly believed this to be desired behavior, and as part of cleanup work ahead of a codeowner's project I "fixed" this. I had thought that we wanted codeowner rules to NOT apply when the user was listed as an owner of one of the applicable rules, essentially assuming their approval as implied due to them taking the git action the check is being applied to. However, this is incorrect, as we still want to push users towards the MR workflow, even when they are in fact an owner who could approve the change.

Edited by Igor Drozdov

Merge request reports