Backfill GraphQL epic type descriptions (part 2)

What does this MR do?

Continuation of !19233 (merged)

Backfill some more GraphQL fields, this time for the Epic type.

Description standards:

• {x} of the {y} where possible !19233 (comment 236991402)
• Booleans framed in terms of "what does this field do" i.e. Indicates repository has a Git repository !19233 (comment 236991402)
• Always use timestamp when describing a Types::TimeType field !19233 (comment 236997153)
• No . at end of strings

Related to #31645 (closed)

changed milestone to %12.6

added GraphQL backstage [DEPRECATED] documentation labels

added 1 commit

• 04463339 - Backfill epic type descriptions

Compare with previous version

mentioned in issue #31645 (closed)

added 1 commit

• 88a1aba1 - Backfill epic type descriptions

Compare with previous version

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected! A merge request is normally reviewed by both a reviewer and a maintainer in its primary category (e.g. frontend or backend), and by a maintainer in all other categories.

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has randomly picked a candidate for each review slot. Feel free to override this selection if you think someone else would be better-suited, or the chosen person is unavailable.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, mention them as you normally would! Danger does not (yet?) automatically notify them for you.

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	Dylan Griffith (@DylanGriffith)	Stan Hu (@stanhu)

Generated by Danger

added 1 commit

• 171d8139 - Backfill epic type descriptions

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• fde1d2e3 - Backfill epic type descriptions

Compare with previous version

added Technical Writing api devopsplan groupproduct planning maintenancerefactor labels

@felipe_artur would you please review?

assigned to @felipe_artur

@cablett Thanks a lot for opening this!!!! LGTM!

I left just one small suggestion.

unassigned @felipe_artur

assigned to @jprovaznik

changed the description

assigned to @eread and unassigned @cablett

@jprovaznik would you please perform maintainer review?

@eread would you please perform docs review?

Thank you both

Thanks @cablett, LGTM . BE LGTM (well - there is no BE change), left one minor nit about wording. Let's wait for @eread review.

unassigned @jprovaznik

approved this merge request

resolved all threads

added 1 commit

• 144f17e8 - Backfill epic type descriptions

Compare with previous version

approved this merge request

assigned to @cablett and unassigned @eread

added 1 deleted label

added 1 commit

• 594ca8f1 - Backfill epic type descriptions

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• fb1b8008 - Backfill epic type descriptions

Compare with previous version

assigned to @eread

assigned to @jprovaznik and unassigned @eread and @cablett

added backend label

resolved all threads

Thanks @cablett, LGTM

Could you please rebase this MR (we should not merge MR's which are >100 commits behind master if master is broken)? I tried to rebase locally myself to speed things up, but hit some conflicts.

assigned to @cablett and unassigned @jprovaznik

added 442 commits

• fb1b8008...0123a8ea - 441 commits from branch master
• 09d03b0a - Backfill epic type descriptions

Compare with previous version

Thanks @cablett, setting MWPS.

enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 09d03b0a succeeds

assigned to @jprovaznik

merged

mentioned in commit cd3d55f7

mentioned in merge request !21536 (merged)

mentioned in merge request !21809 (merged)

mentioned in merge request !22073 (merged)

mentioned in merge request !22199 (merged)

mentioned in merge request !24716 (merged)

changed the description

added docsimprovement label and removed 1 deleted label

added typemaintenance label