[Rubocop] require api endpoint success response

Description of the proposal

• Ensures that all Grape API endpoints(endpoints defined in desc blocks) have a success response
• The purpose of linting this param attribute is for the purposes of improving out OpenAPI documentation
• it is helpful for our api definitions to be consistent and param descriptions benefit api users

#574011 (closed)

How to Validate these changes

Running the linter

1. Open any grape entity file that is not listed in .rubocop_todo/api/description_detail.yml and remove the success response from any desc block
2. Run the new linter on that file ie rubocop --only API/DescriptionSuccessResponse lib/api/badges.rb
3. Observe the offense that was added
4. Change the file back, run the linter again and see no offenses

Ensuring files with exceptions will be ignored

1. run rubocop --only API/DescriptionSuccessResponse --format files - no files should be listed
2. Remove one of the files from .rubocop_todo/api/description_success_response.yml
3. run run rubocop --only API/DescriptionSuccessResponse --format files - see the file you removed listed

*** Add the file back to the exception list ***

Check-list

• Make sure this MR enables a static analysis check rule for new usage but ignores current offenses.
• Mention this proposal in the relevant Slack channels (e.g. #development, #backend, #frontend).
• If there is a choice to make between two potential styles, set up an emoji vote in the MR:
  • CHOICE_A: 🅰️
  • CHOICE_B: 🅱️
  • Vote for both choices, so they are visible to others.
• The MR doesn't have significant objections, and is getting a majority of 👍 vs 👎 (remember that we don't need to reach a consensus).
• (If applicable) One style is getting a majority of vote (compared to the other choice).
• (If applicable) Update the MR with the chosen style.
• Create a follow-up issue to fix the current offenses as a separate iteration: ISSUE_LINK
• Follow the review process as usual.
• Once approved and merged by a maintainer, mention it again:
  • In the relevant Slack channels (e.g. #development, #backend, #frontend).
  • (Optional depending on the impact of the change) In the Engineering Week in Review.