Mark zoekt prometheus metric as deprecated
What does this MR do and why?
This MR marks the prometheus metric as deprecated. It is replaced by a gitlab-exporter
metric (gitlab-org/ruby/gems/gitlab-exporter!216 (merged))
References
- Zoekt metrics from MetricsUpdateCronWorker are ... (#521933)
- Remove search_zoekt_task_processing_queue_size ... (#525102 - closed)
- Add zoekt probe (gitlab-org/ruby/gems/gitlab-exporter!216 - merged)
Screenshots or screen recordings
How to set up and validate locally
docs only
MR acceptance checklist
Evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %17.10
assigned to @terrichu
added documentation label
1 Message This merge request adds or changes documentation files and requires Technical Writing review. The review should happen before merge, but can be post-merge if the merge request is time sensitive. Documentation review
The following files require a review from a technical writer:
-
doc/administration/monitoring/prometheus/gitlab_metrics.md
(Link to current live version)
The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:
-
Metadata for the
*.md
files that you've changed. The first few lines of each*.md
file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change. - The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
- Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
DangerEdited by ****-
mentioned in issue #525102 (closed)
removed missed:17.7 label
removed missed-deliverable label
removed missed:17.8 label
added typemaintenance label and removed typebug label
removed Deliverable label
removed bugperformance label
@ashrafkhamis would you mind a documentation review? I'm marking this metric as deprecated, it will be removed in %18.0 and I have linked the issue for that
requested review from @ashrafkhamis
added docs-only label
- Resolved by Ashraf Khamis