Advanced search: Cleanup sections
What does this MR do and why?
Advanced search: Cleanup sections
- Removes cards from sections
- Adds Crud to replicas block
- Cleanup of Indexing cards
Screenshots or screen recordings
Before | After |
---|---|
Advanced Search | |
![]() |
![]() |
Indexing status | |
![]() |
![]() |
How to set up and validate locally
- http://gdk.test:3000/admin/application_settings/search#js-elasticsearch-settings
- http://gdk.test:3000/admin/application_settings/search#js-indexing-status
Related to #499697 (closed)
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %17.9
assigned to @seggenberger
added UX UX Paper Cuts frontend maintenancerefactor sectiondev typemaintenance labels
added devopsfoundations groupux paper cuts labels
added sectioncore platform label and removed sectiondev label
added pipelinetier-1 label
added backend label
2 Warnings ⚠️ This MR changes code in ee/
, but its Changelog commit is missing theEE: true
trailer. Consider adding it to your Changelog commits.⚠️ This merge request is quite big (542 lines changed), please consider splitting it into multiple merge requests. Reviewer roulette
Category Reviewer Maintainer backend @schmil.monderer
(UTC+2, 1 hour ahead of author)
@vij
(UTC+0, 1 hour behind author)
frontend @fernanda.toledo
(UTC-8, 9 hours behind author)
@pgascouvaillancourt
(UTC-5, 6 hours behind author)
UX @jmiocene
(UTC+1, same timezone as author)
Maintainer review is optional for UX Please refer to documentation page for guidance on how you can benefit from the Reviewer Roulette, or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
If needed, you can retry the
🔁 danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
🚫 DangerEdited by ****- Resolved by Julia Miocene
requested review from @annabeldunstone
- Resolved by Sascha Eggenberger
- Resolved by Sascha Eggenberger
- Resolved by Sascha Eggenberger
- Resolved by Sascha Eggenberger
- Resolved by Sascha Eggenberger
removed review request for @annabeldunstone
requested review from @jmiocene
- Resolved by Sascha Eggenberger
added pipeline:mr-approved label
added pipelinetier-2 label and removed pipelinetier-1 label
Before you set this MR to auto-merge
This merge request will progress on pipeline tiers until it reaches the last tier: pipelinetier-3. We will trigger a new pipeline for each transition to a higher tier.
Before you set this MR to auto-merge, please check the following:
- You are the last maintainer of this merge request
- The latest pipeline for this merge request is pipelinetier-3 (You can find which tier it is in the pipeline name)
- This pipeline is recent enough (created in the last 8 hours)
If all the criteria above apply, please set auto-merge for this merge request.
See pipeline tiers and merging a merge request for more details.
🛠️ Generated bygitlab_quality-test_tooling
.
🐌 Slow tests detected in this merge request. These slow tests might be related to this merge request's changes.Click to expand
Job File Name Duration Expected duration #9073823604 ee/spec/features/search/zoekt/search_spec.rb#L33
Zoekt search finds files with a regex search and allows filtering down again by project 89.45 s < 50.13 s added rspec:slow test detected label
E2E Test Result Summary
allure-report-publisher
generated test report!e2e-test-on-gdk:
✅ test report for be83f3f4expand test summary
+------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Create | 135 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 158 | ✅ | | Data Stores | 33 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 43 | ✅ | | Govern | 78 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 92 | ✅ | | Plan | 82 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 90 | ✅ | | Verify | 51 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 72 | ✅ | | Secure | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7 | ✅ | | Monitor | 8 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 20 | ✅ | | Release | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | ✅ | | Package | 24 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 38 | ✅ | | Manage | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 10 | ✅ | | Fulfillment | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 | ✅ | | Configure | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | ➖ | | Ai-powered | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ➖ | | Analytics | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | ModelOps | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Growth | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ➖ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 425 | 0 | 130 | 0 | 555 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
e2e-test-on-cng:
✅ test report for be83f3f4expand test summary
+------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Package | 29 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 44 | ✅ | | Plan | 86 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 94 | ✅ | | Govern | 83 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 94 | ✅ | | Verify | 52 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 72 | ✅ | | Create | 140 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 162 | ✅ | | Analytics | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Secure | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 | ✅ | | Release | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | ✅ | | Monitor | 8 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 20 | ✅ | | Data Stores | 33 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 43 | ✅ | | Growth | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ➖ | | Configure | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | ➖ | | Fulfillment | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 | ✅ | | ModelOps | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Manage | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 10 | ✅ | | Ai-powered | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ➖ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 443 | 0 | 128 | 0 | 571 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
Edited by ****- Resolved by Paul Gascou-VaillancourtEdited by Sascha Eggenberger
requested review from @jmontal
added pipelinetier-3 pipeline:run-e2e-omnibus-once labels and removed pipelinetier-2 label
requested review from @pgascouvaillancourt
- Resolved by Scott de Jonge
- Resolved by Sascha Eggenberger
- Resolved by Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt
This is looking good @seggenberger! I have an almost-blocking question regarding the use of a min-width CSS util with an arbitrary value. It's minor enough that I think I'll merge this anyways, but please do follow-up on that question if it's relevant
🙏 added this merge request to the merge train at position 2
mentioned in commit db115ba9
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label