Skip to content

Draft: Optimize ListConfigVariablesService (prefill variables service) (retry)

What does this MR do and why?


Note: this is the second try because the last MR was reverted.


We recently added two changes to this service;

  1. cd811a5a We started passing verify_project_sha to YamlProcessor to check the passed ref to avoid malicious sha's. (the ref parameter accepts a commit SHA as a value)

  2. d273ad95 We started passing the ref name to YamlProcessor when fetching prefill variables. The reason was this; When using $CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME in include:rules, the correct jobs but the wrong prefilled variables were included because $CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME were not available.

For 1; we first check whether the passed ref parameter is actually a ref in the project. If so, we don't need to verify the calculated sha.

For 2; we don't have to use RefFinder because we already have ref.

Related to #468827

Expected result

I am expecting that the duration of Ci::ListConfigVariablesService will be decreased.

https://log.gprd.gitlab.net/app/r/s/71r3H

Screenshot_2024-08-08_at_10.41.54

MR acceptance checklist

Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

Merge request reports

Loading