Style fixes for board top bar on small screens
What does this MR do and why?
Style fixes for board top bar on small screens
Fix spacing between rows of items in the small viewport version of the board header controls.
Changelog: fixed EE: true
MR acceptance checklist
Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
Screenshots or screen recordings
Breakpoint | Before | After |
---|---|---|
xs (<576px) |
![]() |
![]() |
sm (≥576px) |
![]() |
![]() |
md (≥768px) (no change) |
![]() |
![]() |
lg (≥992px) (no change) |
![]() |
![]() |
How to set up and validate locally
- Check out this branch locally
- Visit an issue board (for example http://gdk.test:3000/groups/flightjs/-/boards)
- Adjust your window size to match the breakpoints in the screenshots table above
- You will see that the layout of the board controls matches the screenshot
Related to #424397 (closed)
Merge request reports
Activity
added UX Paper Cuts bugux devopsplan groupproject management severity4 typebug + 1 deleted label
assigned to @clavimoniere
changed milestone to %16.10
added Category:Team Planning sectiondev labels
cc @nickbrandt and @nickleonard
- A deleted user
added frontend label
2 Warnings You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests.
That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code,
but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenancerefactor, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.This merge request changed undocumented Vue components in
vue_shared/
. Please consider creating Stories for these components:app/assets/javascripts/vue_shared/components/toggle_labels.vue
Reviewer roulette
Category Reviewer Maintainer frontend @rcrespo3
(UTC-5, same timezone as author)
@sdejonge
(UTC+11, 16 hours ahead of author)
Please check reviewer's status!
Please refer to documentation page for guidance on how you can benefit from the Reviewer Roulette, or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
DangerBundle size analysis [beta]
This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits e0d872a7 and 94ce27a6
Special assetsEntrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent average 4.21 MB 4.21 MB - 0.0 % mainChunk 3.21 MB 3.21 MB - 0.0 %
Please look at the full report for more details
Read more about how this report works.
Generated by
Danger- Resolved by Nick Brandt
@ntepluhina can you also review this one? (forgot to add a reviewer friday)
requested review from @ntepluhina
added pipeline:mr-approved label
- Resolved by Natalia Tepluhina
@ntepluhina
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request has been approved. To ensure we don't only run predictive pipelines, and we don't break
master
, a new pipeline will be started shortly.Please wait for the pipeline to start before resolving this discussion and set auto-merge for the new pipeline. See merging a merge request for more details.
E2E Test Result Summary
allure-report-publisher
generated test report!e2e-test-on-gdk:
test report for 94ce27a6expand test summary
+------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Plan | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53 | ✅ | | Create | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 11 | ✅ | | Govern | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ✅ | | Data Stores | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Package | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Monitor | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 70 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 74 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
e2e-package-and-test:
test report for 94ce27a6expand test summary
+------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Plan | 255 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 268 | ✅ | | Create | 153 | 0 | 20 | 4 | 173 | ✅ | | Monitor | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | ✅ | | Data Stores | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | | Govern | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | ✅ | | Package | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ➖ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 426 | 0 | 35 | 4 | 461 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
e2e-review-qa:
test report for 94ce27a6expand test summary
+------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Create | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 11 | ✅ | | Monitor | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | | Govern | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ✅ | | Plan | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | | Package | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Data Stores | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 20 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 25 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
requested review from @nickbrandt
Look like we have all the approvals now (thank you @nickbrandt
), let's get it merged!enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for efb8b519 succeeds
mentioned in commit 288aa1ed
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
mentioned in merge request kubitus-project/kubitus-installer!2869 (merged)
added releasedpublished label
added pipelinetier-3 label