Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

Continue tidy up of import_export content

Merged Evan Read requested to merge eread/continue-tidy-up-of-import_export-content into master
All threads resolved!

What does this MR do?

Continuing from !142489 (merged), improve the accuracy and helpfulness of the import_export.md page.

Author's checklist

If you are a GitLab team member and only adding documentation, do not add any of the following labels:

  • ~"frontend"
  • ~"backend"
  • ~"type::bug"
  • ~"database"

These labels cause the MR to be added to code verification QA issues.

Reviewer's checklist

Documentation-related MRs should be reviewed by a Technical Writer for a non-blocking review, based on Documentation Guidelines and the Style Guide.

If you aren't sure which tech writer to ask, use roulette or ask in the #docs Slack channel.

  • If the content requires it, ensure the information is reviewed by a subject matter expert.
  • Technical writer review items:
    • Ensure docs metadata is present and up-to-date.
    • Ensure the appropriate labels are added to this MR.
    • Ensure a release milestone is set.
    • If relevant to this MR, ensure content topic type principles are in use, including:
      • The headings should be something you'd do a Google search for. Instead of Default behavior, say something like Default behavior when you close an issue.
      • The headings (other than the page title) should be active. Instead of Configuring GDK, say something like Configure GDK.
      • Any task steps should be written as a numbered list.
      • If the content still needs to be edited for topic types, you can create a follow-up issue with the docs-technical-debt label.
  • Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the reviews above. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review.
Edited by Evan Read

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
    • Author Maintainer
      Resolved by Evan Read

      @wortschi @m_frankiewicz Could you review? I'm on the look out for anything inaccurate on this page, but there's nothing I know about other than what I've fixed in: !142489 (merged).

      Could you:

      1. Review the pretty minor changes I've made here.
      2. Gave a look at the review app I've built for this MR and let me know if anything else needs fixing? Let me know if there's nothing you can see.
  • Evan Read requested review from @m_frankiewicz and @wortschi

    requested review from @m_frankiewicz and @wortschi

  • Martin Wortschack
  • Martin Wortschack approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Evan Read requested review from @rdickenson

    requested review from @rdickenson

  • Evan Read resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • Russell Dickenson approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • @eread I've reviewed, approved, and merged this MR. :thumbsup:

  • mentioned in commit 6f791f49

  • added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label

  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading