Update AI-Gateway blueprint

What does this MR do and why?

Update AI-Gateway architecture blueprint in order to clarify AI-Gateway protocol definition

Screenshots or screen recordings

Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.

Before	After

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

• I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.

changed milestone to %16.7

added Category:Code Suggestions groupcode creation labels

assigned to @mikolaj_wawrzyniak

added devopscreate sectiondev labels

added Architecture Evolution Blueprint documentation labels

	2 Messages
	This merge request might require a review from a Coach Engineer.
	This merge request adds or changes documentation files. A review from the Technical Writing team before you merge is recommended. Reviews can happen after you merge.

Architecture Evolution Review

This merge request might require a review from a Coach Engineer.

Following files, that may require the additional review, have been changed:

• doc/architecture/blueprints/ai_gateway/index.md

Documentation review

The following files require a review from a technical writer:

• doc/architecture/blueprints/ai_gateway/index.md (Link to current live version)

The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:

• Metadata for the *.md files that you've changed. The first few lines of each *.md file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change.
• The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
• Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

Hey @mksionek @alipniagov @nicolasdular @reprazent @jprovaznik please take a look at this MR. I tired to clarify AI Gateway blueprint around expected communication protocol that sparked conversation at !135837 (closed)

requested review from @reprazent and @mksionek

added docs-only label

Proper labels assigned to this merge request. Please ignore me.

@mikolaj_wawrzyniak - please see the following guidance and update this merge request.

	1 Error
	Please add typebug typefeature, or typemaintenance label to this merge request.

removed review request for @reprazent

added 1 commit

• 56ea6104 - Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

Compare with previous version

approved this merge request

mentioned in merge request !137122 (merged)

added 1 commit

• 5d6afa89 - Update AI Gwateway blueprint

Compare with previous version

approved this merge request

added 1 commit

• a41f3de1 - Soften wording on type requirement

Compare with previous version

approved this merge request

resolved all threads

resolved all threads

added typemaintenance label

resolved all threads

resolved all threads

merged

mentioned in commit 53a79c5a

added workflowstaging-canary label

added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label

added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label

added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label

added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label

added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label

added maintenancerefactor label

added releasedcandidate label