Fix the assert_named_queries logic

What does this MR do and why?

The issue was excludes_named_query was overwriting has_named_query which causes all the tests to pass even the query was not present in the call.

Screenshots or screen recordings

Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.

Before	After

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

• I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.

assigned to @rkumar555

added backend label

	1 Warning
	There were no new or modified SaaS feature YAML files detected in this MR. For guidance on when to use a SaaS feature, please see the SaaS feature documentation.

	1 Message
	CHANGELOG missing: If this merge request needs a changelog entry, add the Changelog trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog. If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	mallocke (UTC+13, 11 hours ahead of @rkumar555)	jarka (UTC+2, same timezone as @rkumar555)

Please check reviewer's status!

• Reviewer is available!
• Reviewer is unavailable!

Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

@rkumar555 - please see the following guidance and update this merge request.

	1 Error
	Please add typebug typefeature, or typemaintenance label to this merge request.

added Category:Global Search groupglobal search typebug labels

added devopsdata stores sectioncore platform labels

changed milestone to %16.6

resolved all threads

approved this merge request

@rkumar555 thank you for fixing that!

@maddievn are you available for a maintainer review here? (It turns out that we broke it in Allow excluding archived projects from merge re... (!126024 - merged) )

requested review from @maddievn

@dgruzd, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request has been approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.

For more info, please refer to the following links:

• rspec predictive jobs
• jest predictive jobs
• merging a merge request.

added pipeline:mr-approved label

approved this merge request

resolved all threads

@dgruzd or @maddievn Could you please set MWPS ?

enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 3af7b5df succeeds

merged

mentioned in commit 81b3b07b

added workflowstaging-canary label

added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label

added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label

added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label

added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label

added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label

added releasedcandidate label