Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

Allow verification of files in Object Storage (Filesize check)

Merged Valery Sizov requested to merge 13845-allow-verification-of-files-in-object-storage into master
All threads resolved!

What does this MR do and why?

This MR adds Geo verification of OS-stored files via comparison of file sizes.

Screenshots or screen recordings

Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.

Before After

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

Related to #13845 (closed)

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • Valery Sizov added 893 commits

    added 893 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • Valery Sizov added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    Compare with previous version

  • Valery Sizov added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    Compare with previous version

  • Valery Sizov changed title from Draft: Allow verification of files in Object Storage (Iteration 1: filesize) to Draft: Allow verification of files in Object Storage (Filesize check)

    changed title from Draft: Allow verification of files in Object Storage (Iteration 1: filesize) to Draft: Allow verification of files in Object Storage (Filesize check)

  • Valery Sizov marked this merge request as ready

    marked this merge request as ready

  • Valery Sizov requested review from @aakriti.gupta

    requested review from @aakriti.gupta

  • mentioned in issue #13845 (closed)

  • Aakriti Gupta
  • Aakriti Gupta
    • Resolved by Aakriti Gupta

      I have reviewed the merge request and left two questions and one suggestion as comments. The questions are about the reasons for removing the tests and the possibility of creating model_record only once outside the tests. The suggestion is to add the introduced_by_url to the commit message. I estimate that a small amount of work is required to address these comments.

  • Aakriti Gupta approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • :wave: @aakriti.gupta, thanks for approving this merge request.

    This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.

    For more info, please refer to the following links:

  • Aakriti Gupta removed review request for @aakriti.gupta

    removed review request for @aakriti.gupta

  • Valery Sizov added 778 commits

    added 778 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • Valery Sizov added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • 9c807191 - Allow verification of files in Object Storage

    Compare with previous version

  • Valery Sizov added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • e20e4909 - Allow verification of files in Object Storage

    Compare with previous version

  • Valery Sizov requested review from @aakriti.gupta

    requested review from @aakriti.gupta

  • Valery Sizov requested review from @mkozono and removed review request for @aakriti.gupta

    requested review from @mkozono and removed review request for @aakriti.gupta

  • mentioned in issue #423112 (closed)

  • Aakriti Gupta requested review from @dbalexandre and removed review request for @mkozono

    requested review from @dbalexandre and removed review request for @mkozono

  • Aakriti Gupta added 773 commits

    added 773 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • unassigned @vsizov

  • resolved all threads

  • Douglas Barbosa Alexandre approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Douglas Barbosa Alexandre enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 75283d2d succeeds

    enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 75283d2d succeeds

  • mentioned in commit d33cde7e

  • added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label

  • mentioned in issue #410387 (closed)

  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading