Show Popover on Epic links within Markdown

changed milestone to %16.2

added UI polish UX backend devopsplan epics featureaddition frontend groupproduct planning sectiondev typefeature workflowin dev labels

assigned to @kushalpandya

3 Warnings

This merge request is quite big (690 lines changed), please consider splitting it into multiple merge requests.

featureaddition and featureenhancement merge requests normally have a documentation change. Consider adding a documentation update or confirming the documentation plan with the Technical Writer counterpart.

For more information, see:

The Handbook page on merge request types.
The definition of done documentation.

This merge request changed files with disabled eslint rules. Please consider fixing them.

Disabled eslint rules

The following files have disabled eslint rules. Please consider fixing them:

ee/app/assets/javascripts/epics_list/components/epics_list_root.vue

Run the following command for more details

node_modules/.bin/eslint --report-unused-disable-directives --no-inline-config \
  'ee/app/assets/javascripts/epics_list/components/epics_list_root.vue'

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	Minahil Nichols (`@minahilnichols`) (UTC-4, 9.5 hours behind `@kushalpandya`)	Luke Duncalfe (`@.luke`) (UTC+12, 6.5 hours ahead of `@kushalpandya`)
frontend	Elwyn Benson (`@elwyn-gitlab`) (UTC+12, 6.5 hours ahead of `@kushalpandya`)	Coung Ngo (`@cngo`) (UTC+1, 4.5 hours behind `@kushalpandya`)
UX	Libor Vanc (`@lvanc`) (UTC-10, 15.5 hours behind `@kushalpandya`)	Maintainer review is optional for UX

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

changed the description

@andlovu Can you review UX here please? Please note that MR is kept in Draft only because it is missing tests, the functionality itself is complete.

requested review from @andlovu

added 1 commit

7c74da78 - Show Popover on Epic links within Markdown

Compare with previous version

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits a1f7a04d and daa34e71

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	4.13 MB	4.13 MB	+1.03 KB	0.0 %
mainChunk	2.99 MB	2.99 MB	+1.03 KB	0.0 %

Note: We do not have exact data for a1f7a04d. So we have used data from: 69f88c32.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

e2e-test-on-gdk: test report for daa34e71

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            suites summary                             |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Framework sanity | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Monitor          | 4      | 0      | 0       | 4     | 4     | ❗     |
| Create           | 8      | 0      | 1       | 6     | 9     | ❗     |
| Govern           | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Data Stores      | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Manage           | 1      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 1     | ✅     |
| Plan             | 4      | 0      | 0       | 3     | 4     | ❗     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total            | 21     | 0      | 2       | 13    | 23    | ❗     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-review-qa: test report for daa34e71

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            suites summary                             |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Monitor          | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Plan             | 50     | 0      | 1       | 0     | 51    | ✅     |
| Data Stores      | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Framework sanity | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Create           | 8      | 0      | 1       | 1     | 9     | ❗     |
| Manage           | 1      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 1     | ✅     |
| Govern           | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total            | 67     | 0      | 3       | 1     | 70    | ❗     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+