Do not allow emails with trailing spaces to be added as invites

changed milestone to %16.1

added Next Up bugux devopsgrowth groupacquisition priority4 sectiongrowth severity4 typebug workflowin dev + 1 deleted label

assigned to @dstull

changed the description

@dstull Some end-to-end (E2E) tests have been selected based on the stage label on this MR. If not run already, please run the e2e:package-and-test-ee job in the qa stage and review the results before merging this MR. (E2E tests are not run automatically on some MRs due to runner resource constraints.)

If you would like to run all e2e tests, please apply the pipeline:run-all-e2e label and restart the pipeline.

Once done, please apply the emoji on this comment.

For any questions or help in reviewing the E2E test results, please reach out on the internal #quality Slack channel.

added frontend label

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	Ross Byrne (`@robyrne`) (UTC+1, 5 hours ahead of `@dstull`)	Vitali Tatarintev (`@ck3g`) (UTC+2, 6 hours ahead of `@dstull`)
frontend	James Rushford (`@jrushford`) (UTC+2, 6 hours ahead of `@dstull`)	Vitaly Slobodin (`@vitallium`) (UTC+2, 6 hours ahead of `@dstull`)
test for `spec/features/*`	Ross Byrne (`@robyrne`) (UTC+1, 5 hours ahead of `@dstull`)	Maintainer review is optional for test for `spec/features/*`
UX	Kevin Comoli (`@kcomoli`) (UTC+2, 6 hours ahead of `@dstull`)	Maintainer review is optional for UX

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits ea360037 and d80ecee2

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	4.13 MB	4.13 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	2.99 MB	2.99 MB	-	0.0 %

Note: We do not have exact data for ea360037. So we have used data from: 04f47f21.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

e2e-test-on-gdk: test report for d80ecee2

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            suites summary                             |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Framework sanity | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Create           | 8      | 0      | 1       | 6     | 9     | ❗     |
| Govern           | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Monitor          | 4      | 0      | 0       | 4     | 4     | ❗     |
| Plan             | 4      | 0      | 0       | 3     | 4     | ❗     |
| Data Stores      | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Manage           | 1      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 1     | ✅     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total            | 21     | 0      | 2       | 13    | 23    | ❗     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-review-qa: test report for d80ecee2

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            suites summary                             |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Monitor          | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Manage           | 1      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 1     | ✅     |
| Create           | 8      | 0      | 1       | 1     | 9     | ❗     |
| Framework sanity | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Data Stores      | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Govern           | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Plan             | 3      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total            | 20     | 0      | 3       | 1     | 23    | ❗     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+