Set max_locks_per_transaction to 128
What does this MR do and why?
Resolves #412760 (comment 1426797584) by increasing max_locks_per_transaction
to 128 for all pg versions
Screenshots or screen recordings
Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.
Before | After |
---|---|
How to set up and validate locally
Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %16.1
added Engineering Productivity label
assigned to @jennli
mentioned in issue #412760
1 Message CHANGELOG missing: If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab FOSS, add the
Changelog
trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog.If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab EE, also add the
EE: true
trailer to your commit message.If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.
Pipeline Changes
This merge request contains changes to the pipeline configuration for the GitLab project.
Please consider the effect of the changes in this merge request on the following:
- Effects on different pipeline types
- Effects on non-canonical projects:
gitlab-foss
security
dev
- personal forks
- Effects on pipeline performance
Please consider communicating these changes to the broader team following the communication guideline for pipeline changes
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer maintenanceworkflow / maintenancepipelines for CI, Danger Ross Byrne (
@robyrne
) (UTC+1, 8 hours ahead of@jennli
)David Dieulivol (
@ddieulivol
) (UTC+2, 9 hours ahead of@jennli
)Engineering Productivity Reviewer review is optional for Engineering Productivity David Dieulivol (
@ddieulivol
) (UTC+2, 9 hours ahead of@jennli
)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Danger- Resolved by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
Proper labels assigned to this merge request. Please ignore me.
@jennli - please see the following guidance and update this merge request.1 Error Please add typebug typefeature, or typemaintenance label to this merge request. Edited by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
added maintenancescalability label
added typemaintenance label
added workflowin dev label
mentioned in merge request !123421 (closed)
Allure report
allure-report-publisher
generated test report!e2e-test-on-gdk:
test report for dfe05e48expand test summary
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Manage | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ✅ | | Create | 8 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 9 | ❗ | | Govern | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Framework sanity | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Monitor | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | ❗ | | Data Stores | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Plan | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | ❌ | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 17 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 23 | ❌ | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
requested review from @schin1
@schin1
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
added pipeline:mr-approved label
- Resolved by Nao Hashizume
@jennli lgtm!
@ddieulivol could you do the maintainer review for maintenancepipelines and Engineering Productivity (feel free to ping another if you prefer 2 different maintainer reviews)?
requested review from @ddieulivol and removed review request for @schin1
mentioned in merge request !123711 (merged)
removed review request for @ddieulivol
added workflowin review label and removed workflowin dev label
added workflowrefinement label and removed workflowin review label
changed milestone to %16.2
added missed:16.1 label
added 2570 commits
-
fe4f952a...974785c1 - 2568 commits from branch
master
- 84f38230 - Set max_locks_per_transaction to 100 for pg12
- dfe05e48 - Update max_locks_per_tansaction to 128 for all pg versions
-
fe4f952a...974785c1 - 2568 commits from branch
requested review from @schin1
requested review from @nao.hashizume
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 3207a84f succeeds
mentioned in commit 30fd4b60
added workflowstaging-canary label and removed workflowrefinement label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label
mentioned in merge request !125126 (merged)
mentioned in merge request !124706 (merged)
mentioned in merge request !118720 (merged)
mentioned in issue #417447 (closed)
mentioned in merge request !125903 (merged)
added releasedcandidate label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label