Format explain vulnerability responses with markdown format headers
What does this MR do and why?
Responses to Explain this Vulnerability
do not include the language header in markdown formatted code blocks. This change requests that these headers are included to provided better looking and more consistent looking code blocks.
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Merge request reports
Activity
assigned to @mokhax
mentioned in commit 44b77c8f
added 1 commit
- 44b77c8f - Format explain vulnerability responses with markdown format headers
- A deleted user
added backend label
1 Warning featureaddition and featureenhancement merge requests normally have a documentation change. Consider adding a documentation update or confirming the documentation plan with the Technical Writer counterpart.
For more information, see:
- The Handbook page on merge request types.
- The definition of done documentation.
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer backend Matt Kasa (
@mattkasa
) (UTC-7)Peter Leitzen (
@splattael
) (UTC+2)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Danger- Resolved by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
Proper labels assigned to this merge request. Please ignore me.
@mokhax - please see the following guidance and update this merge request.1 Error Please add typebug typefeature, or typemaintenance label to this merge request. Edited by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
added featureenhancement typefeature labels
added groupthreat insights label
added devopsgovern sectionsec labels
changed milestone to %15.11
requested review from @minahilnichols
- Resolved by George Koltsov
@minahilnichols would you mind reviewing this change?
marked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed
@minahilnichols
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
added pipeline:mr-approved label
requested review from @georgekoltsov and removed review request for @minahilnichols
changed milestone to %16.0
mentioned in issue #406633 (closed)
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 04bd8e27 succeeds
mentioned in commit d1cb81af
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowproduction label
added releasedcandidate label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label
mentioned in merge request kubitus-project/kubitus-installer!2061 (merged)