Use "your" in context switcher to be more specific
What does this MR do and why?
Updates the language in the context switcher to be more specific and useful.
- Search for your projects or groups
- View all your projects
- View all your groups
Screenshots or screen recordings
Before | After |
---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
How to set up and validate locally
- Enable the feature flag:
echo "Feature.enable(:super_sidebar_nav)" | rails c
- Enable the user setting from the user dropdown:
- Open the context switcher to find the text changes
- Enter anything in the search bar to filter down results
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Merge request reports
Activity
assigned to @aregnery
changed milestone to %15.11
added devopsmanage sectiondev labels
Please wait for Reviewer Roulette to suggest a designer for UX review, and then assign them as Reviewer. This helps evenly distribute reviews across UX.
This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.
removed severity4 label
1 Message CHANGELOG missing: If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab FOSS, add the
Changelog
trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog.If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab EE, also add the
EE: true
trailer to your commit message.If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer frontend Deepika Guliani (
@deepika.guliani
) (UTC+5.5, 9.5 hours ahead of@aregnery
)Florie Guibert (
@fguibert
) (UTC+10, 14 hours ahead of@aregnery
)UX Alex Fracazo (
@afracazo
) (UTC+10, 14 hours ahead of@aregnery
)Maintainer review is optional for UX To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Dangermentioned in issue #391523 (closed)
Bundle size analysis [beta]
This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits 94fc9c27 and b4315705
Special assetsEntrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent average 3.62 MB 3.62 MB - 0.0 % mainChunk 2.08 MB 2.08 MB - 0.0 %
Note: We do not have exact data for 94fc9c27. So we have used data from: 7335acc7.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.Please look at the full report for more details
Read more about how this report works.
Generated by
DangerAllure report
allure-report-publisher
generated test report!e2e-review-qa:
test report for b4315705expand test summary
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Data Stores | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | ✅ | | Plan | 49 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50 | ✅ | | Create | 28 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 29 | ✅ | | Govern | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | ✅ | | Monitor | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | | Verify | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | ✅ | | Manage | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 11 | ✅ | | Package | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Framework sanity | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10 | ✅ | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 156 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 163 | ✅ | +------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
- Resolved by Olena Horal-Koretska
requested review from @afracazo
- Resolved by Olena Horal-Koretska
@ankit.panchal will you do the frontend review?
requested review from @ankit.panchal
@ankit.panchal
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
added pipeline:mr-approved label
requested review from @ohoral and removed review request for @ankit.panchal
removed review request for @afracazo
marked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed
- Resolved by Olena Horal-Koretska
- Resolved by Olena Horal-Koretska
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 62267ae9 succeeds
mentioned in commit 8c01917f
added workflowstaging-canary label and removed workflowin review label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added releasedcandidate label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label
mentioned in issue gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com#32488 (closed)