Add namespaces exclusion form

changed milestone to %15.11

added frontend grouputilization sectionfulfillment labels

assigned to @aalakkad

added devopsfulfillment label

added 1 commit

46dcf00a - Dump

Compare with previous version

Proper labels assigned to this merge request. Please ignore me.

@aalakkad - please see the following guidance and update this merge request.

	1 Error
	Please add typebug typefeature, or typemaintenance label to this merge request.

added backend feature flag labels

	6 Warnings
	021c7b69: The commit subject must contain at least 3 words. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	021c7b69: Commits that change 30 or more lines across at least 3 files should describe these changes in the commit body. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	featureaddition and featureenhancement merge requests normally have a documentation change. Consider adding a documentation update or confirming the documentation plan with the Technical Writer counterpart. For more information, see: The Handbook page on merge request types. The definition of done documentation.
	This merge request changed files with disabled eslint rules. Please consider fixing them.
	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenancerefactor, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.
	This merge request changed undocumented Vue components in `vue_shared/`. Please consider creating Stories for these components: `app/assets/javascripts/vue_shared/components/entity_select/entity_select.vue`

1 Message

CHANGELOG missing:

If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab FOSS, add the Changelog trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog.

If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab EE, also add the EE: true trailer to your commit message.

If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

Disabled eslint rules

The following files have disabled eslint rules. Please consider fixing them:

ee/app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/namespace_limits/components/namespace_limits_app.vue

Run the following command for more details

node_modules/.bin/eslint --report-unused-disable-directives --no-inline-config \
  'ee/app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/namespace_limits/components/namespace_limits_app.vue'

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	Deepika Guliani (`@deepika.guliani`) (UTC+5.5, 2.5 hours ahead of `@aalakkad`)	Justin Ho (`@justin_ho`) (UTC+7, 4 hours ahead of `@aalakkad`)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

changed title from Add controller/routes for admin level plan limits to Add namespaces exclusion form

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

e2e-package-and-test: test report for 46dcf00a

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            suites summary                             |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Manage           | 64     | 0      | 6       | 36    | 70    | ❗     |
| Data Stores      | 68     | 0      | 0       | 24    | 68    | ❗     |
| Plan             | 120    | 0      | 0       | 46    | 120   | ❗     |
| Analytics        | 4      | 0      | 0       | 4     | 4     | ❗     |
| Create           | 320    | 2      | 14      | 136   | 336   | ❌     |
| Govern           | 92     | 0      | 0       | 92    | 92    | ❗     |
| Verify           | 102    | 0      | 18      | 100   | 120   | ❗     |
| Package          | 0      | 0      | 6       | 0     | 6     | ➖     |
| Secure           | 14     | 0      | 10      | 14    | 24    | ❗     |
| ModelOps         | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
| Fulfillment      | 4      | 0      | 44      | 0     | 48    | ✅     |
| Monitor          | 16     | 0      | 0       | 16    | 16    | ❗     |
| Release          | 12     | 0      | 0       | 10    | 12    | ❗     |
| Configure        | 0      | 0      | 6       | 0     | 6     | ➖     |
| Framework sanity | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
| Growth           | 0      | 0      | 4       | 0     | 4     | ➖     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total            | 816    | 2      | 112     | 478   | 930   | ❌     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-review-qa: test report for 021c7b69

expand test summary

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            suites summary                             |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                  | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Plan             | 49     | 0      | 1       | 0     | 50    | ✅     |
| Create           | 28     | 0      | 1       | 0     | 29    | ✅     |
| Govern           | 24     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 24    | ✅     |
| Manage           | 8      | 0      | 3       | 0     | 11    | ✅     |
| Verify           | 10     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 10    | ✅     |
| Data Stores      | 22     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 22    | ✅     |
| Framework sanity | 9      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 10    | ✅     |
| Monitor          | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Package          | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total            | 154    | 0      | 7       | 0     | 161   | ✅     |
+------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

Setting label(s) Category:Consumables Cost Management based on grouputilization.

added Category:Consumables Cost Management label

added 600 commits

46dcf00a...aec4eea0 - 598 commits from branch master
21fe65e2 - Add frontend skeleton for plan limits
ced792cf - Dump

Compare with previous version

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits e513287a and 021c7b69

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	3.64 MB	3.64 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	2.08 MB	2.08 MB	-	0.0 %

Significant Growth: 1

Expand

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
pages.admin.namespace_limits	18 KB	225.31 KB	+207.31 KB	1151.9 %

Your MR has at least one entrypoint growing significantly (more > 1 KB or 2%). If you write new or extend existing features, this is expected and there is nothing to worry about.

Please consider pinging someone from the FE Foundations (@leipert, @markrian, @ohoral or @pgascouvaillancourt) for review, if you are unsure about the size increase.

Note: We do not have exact data for e513287a. So we have used data from: 70981116.
The target commit was too new, so we used the latest commit from master we have info on.
It might help to rerun the bundle-size-review job
This might mean that you have a few false positives in this report. If something unrelated to your code changes is reported, you can check this comparison in order to see if they caused this change.

Please look at the full report for more details

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	Sharmad Nachnolkar (`@snachnolkar`) (UTC+5.5, 2.5 hours ahead of `@aalakkad`)	Lukas Eipert (`@leipert`) (UTC+2, 1 hour behind `@aalakkad`)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits b413737f and d3cf44a1

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	4.02 MB	4.02 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	2.88 MB	2.88 MB	-	0.0 %

Significant Growth: 1

Expand

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
pages.admin.namespace_limits	174.08 KB	412.76 KB	+238.68 KB	137.1 %

Your MR has at least one entrypoint growing significantly (more > 1 KB or 2%). If you write new or extend existing features, this is expected and there is nothing to worry about.

Please consider pinging someone from the FE Foundations (@leipert, @markrian, @ohoral or @pgascouvaillancourt) for review, if you are unsure about the size increase.

Note: We do not have exact data for b413737f. So we have used data from: 8e71b9d3.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

Add namespaces exclusion form

What does this MR do and why?

Screenshots or screen recordings

How to set up and validate locally

MR acceptance checklist

Activity

Disabled eslint rules

Reviewer roulette

Allure report

Bundle size analysis [beta]

Special assets

Significant Growth: 1

Reviewer roulette

Bundle size analysis [beta]

Special assets

Significant Growth: 1

Add namespaces exclusion form

What does this MR do and why?

Screenshots or screen recordings

How to set up and validate locally

MR acceptance checklist

Merge request reports

Activity

Disabled eslint rules

Reviewer roulette

Allure report

Bundle size analysis [beta]

Special assets

Significant Growth: 1

Reviewer roulette

Bundle size analysis [beta]

Special assets

Significant Growth: 1