Add self-monitoring deprecation notice for self-monitoring project

changed milestone to %15.10

added auto updated devopsmonitor grouprespond sectionops typemaintenance workflowin dev labels

assigned to @rkadam3

	2 Warnings
	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenancerefactor, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.
	Please add a merge request subtype to this merge request.

1 Message

CHANGELOG missing:

If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab FOSS, add the Changelog trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog.

If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab EE, also add the EE: true trailer to your commit message.

If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	Siddharth Dungarwal (`@sdungarwal`) (UTC+5.5, same timezone as `@rkadam3`)	Dylan Griffith (`@DylanGriffith`) (UTC+11, 5.5 hours ahead of `@rkadam3`)
frontend	Rudy Crespo (`@rcrespo3`) (UTC-5, 10.5 hours behind `@rkadam3`)	Coung Ngo (`@cngo`) (UTC+0, 5.5 hours behind `@rkadam3`)
UX	Michael Fangman (`@mfangman`) (UTC-6, 11.5 hours behind `@rkadam3`)	Maintainer review is optional for UX

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

added 1 commit

2a6be1e6 - Update translations for strings

Compare with previous version

@mgandres - Do you mind taking a look from frontend perspective, please?

Since this is purely frontend MR, I think we do not need backend review on this one.

requested review from @mgandres

mentioned in issue #353145 (closed)

approved this merge request

@mgandres, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.

For more info, please refer to the following links:

added pipeline:mr-approved label

requested review from @tristan.read and removed review request for @mgandres

removed review request for @tristan.read

mentioned in issue gitlab-org/monitor/respond#204 (closed)

added 1 commit

fdcd1d61 - Change deprecation milestone

Compare with previous version

requested review from @tristan.read

added 1 commit

73285806 - Update translations for strings

Compare with previous version

resolved all threads

Thanks @rkadam3, the changes look good to me, I'll approve. Because it's a user-facing change I believe it technically needs a product design reviewer to look at it.

@nickleonard I spun the roulette and it chose you - would you mind helping with this?

Feel free to ping back to me for merge, or another maintainer.

approved this merge request

requested review from @nickleonard

added UX label

Please wait for Reviewer Roulette to suggest a designer for UX review, and then assign them as Reviewer. This helps evenly distribute reviews across UX.

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.