Update and polish revert-MR template

What does this MR do?

In Improves revert-MR message (gitlab-org/ruby/gems/gitlab-dangerfiles!190 - merged) a technical writer (me!) is proposing improvements to the new revert-MR message shown in merge requests. @sselhorn pointed out that some of the information would be better placed in the revert template itself.

This merge request starts with two commits:

• !109529 (027966da) polishes the grammar and style of the existing template without introducing anything new. If the proposed improvements need to be reverted, we can at least preserve these fixes.
• !109529 (e470bd7b) adds more information to the template:
  • moves info about timing-sensitive label to the top
  • adds checkboxes about version, and what to do with the ~"regression:*" label
  • adds a related-links subheading, which felt like an oversight

Related issues

Blocks Improves revert-MR message (gitlab-org/ruby/gems/gitlab-dangerfiles!190 - merged)

Author's checklist

• Optional. Consider taking the GitLab Technical Writing Fundamentals course.
• Follow the:
  • Documentation process.
  • Documentation guidelines.
  • Style Guide.
• If you're adding or changing the main heading of the page (H1), ensure that the product tier badge is added.
• If you are a GitLab team member, request a review based on:
  • The documentation page's metadata.
  • The associated Technical Writer.

If you are a GitLab team member and only adding documentation, do not add any of the following labels:

• ~"frontend"
• ~"backend"
• ~"type::bug"
• ~"database"

These labels cause the MR to be added to code verification QA issues.

Reviewer's checklist

Documentation-related MRs should be reviewed by a Technical Writer for a non-blocking review, based on Documentation Guidelines and the Style Guide.

If you aren't sure which tech writer to ask, use roulette or ask in the #docs Slack channel.

• If the content requires it, ensure the information is reviewed by a subject matter expert.
• Technical writer review items:
  • Ensure docs metadata is present and up-to-date.
  • Ensure the appropriate labels are added to this MR.
  • Ensure a release milestone is set.
  • If relevant to this MR, ensure content topic type principles are in use, including:
    • The headings should be something you'd do a Google search for. Instead of Default behavior, say something like Default behavior when you close an issue.
    • The headings (other than the page title) should be active. Instead of Configuring GDK, say something like Configure GDK.
    • Any task steps should be written as a numbered list.
    • If the content still needs to be edited for topic types, you can create a follow-up issue with the docs-technical-debt label.
• Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the reviews above. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review.