Assign new package groups to feature flags

What does this MR do and why?

Describe in detail what your merge request does and why.

Context

In https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ci-cd/package-stage/package/-/issues/72+ we went through the restructuring of the group, and we now have two group labels: grouppackage registry and groupcontainer registry

In gitlab-org/quality/engineering-analytics/team-tasks#86 we discovered the problem dashboards were not accurate is because the feature flags were still assigned to the previous group.

Solution

In this MR we are assigning previous group::package feature flags to their corresponding new group.

Screenshots or screen recordings

Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

• I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.

Relates https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/ci-cd/package-stage/package/-/issues/72

assigned to @michelletorres

requested review from @jdrpereira and @10io

added feature flag label

	1 Warning
	aa8380bc: Commits that change 30 or more lines across at least 3 files should describe these changes in the commit body. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

added devopspackage sectionops labels

mentioned in issue gitlab-org/quality/engineering-analytics/team-tasks#86

@michelletorres - please see the following guidance and update this merge request.

	1 Error
	Please add typebug typefeature, or typemaintenance label to this merge request.

changed the description

changed milestone to %15.7

added maintenanceworkflow typemaintenance labels

resolved all threads

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

e2e-package-and-test: test report for aa8380bc

expand test summary

+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                              suites summary                               |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|                      | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Manage               | 128    | 0      | 10      | 0     | 138   | ✅     |
| Create               | 320    | 0      | 8       | 0     | 328   | ✅     |
| Verify               | 90     | 0      | 16      | 0     | 106   | ✅     |
| Secure               | 12     | 0      | 4       | 4     | 16    | ❗     |
| Govern               | 82     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 82    | ✅     |
| Plan                 | 120    | 0      | 0       | 0     | 120   | ✅     |
| Analytics            | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Package              | 0      | 0      | 6       | 0     | 6     | ➖     |
| Monitor              | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Fulfillment          | 4      | 0      | 30      | 0     | 34    | ✅     |
| Configure            | 0      | 0      | 6       | 0     | 6     | ➖     |
| Release              | 12     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 12    | ✅     |
| Version sanity check | 0      | 0      | 2       | 2     | 2     | ➖     |
| ModelOps             | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total                | 774    | 0      | 84      | 6     | 858   | ❗     |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

approved this merge request

Thanks @michelletorres !

This LGTM!

Approving!

removed review request for @10io

@10io, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.

For more info, please refer to the following links:

• rspec minimal jobs
• jest minimal jobs
• merging a merge request.

added 1 deleted label

approved this merge request

mentioned in issue michelletorres/planner#59 (closed)

requested review from @10io

resolved all threads

enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for b0e18bc4 succeeds

merged

mentioned in commit ee50660f

added workflowstaging-canary label

added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label

added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label

added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label

added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label

added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label

added releasedcandidate label

added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label