Skip to content

Use unambiguous name for base class on group link services

What does this MR do and why?

I'm tackling !58530 (closed) and trying to reduce the scope. This MR makes the name of the base class on the group link services unambiguous.

See discussion: !58530 (comment 544306008)

🛠 with at Siemens

/cc @bufferoverflow

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

Merge request reports