Issue: Fix spacing on emoji status in title
What does this MR do and why?
Fixes the non-existent spacing between the user name and the status emoji.
Screenshots or screen recordings
Before | After |
---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
How to set up and validate locally
Create an issue and set a status to your current user.
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Merge request reports
Activity
added Beautifying our UI UI polish featureenhancement frontend grouppersonal productivity sectiondev typebug + 1 deleted label
assigned to @seggenberger
added typefeature label and removed typebug label
added typebug label and removed typefeature label
removed featureenhancement label
changed milestone to %15.6
2 Warnings You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests.
That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code,
but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.Please add a merge request subtype to this merge request. Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer frontend Andrei Zubov (
@andrei.zubov
) (UTC+1, same timezone as@seggenberger
)Jacques Erasmus (
@jerasmus
) (UTC+1, same timezone as@seggenberger
)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Danger- Resolved by Jacques Erasmus
Hey @andrei.zubov a very small typebug fix to review, TY!
requested review from @andrei.zubov
Bundle size analysis [beta]
This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits e154e978 and 20ef1b1d
Special assetsEntrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent average 3.6 MB 3.6 MB - 0.0 % mainChunk 1.96 MB 1.96 MB - 0.0 %
Note: We do not have exact data for e154e978. So we have used data from: d0d80fc7.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.Please look at the full report for more details
Read more about how this report works.
Generated by
Dangermarked the checklist item I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR. as completed
Allure report
allure-report-publisher
generated test report!e2e-review-qa:
test report for 20ef1b1dexpand test summary
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Plan | 49 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 50 | ❗ | | Verify | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | ✅ | | Manage | 43 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 46 | ❗ | | Create | 28 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 29 | ✅ | | Govern | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 15 | ✅ | | Configure | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Package | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Feature flag handler sanity checks | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | ✅ | | Version sanity check | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | +------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 151 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 165 | ❗ | +------------------------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
requested review from @jerasmus and removed review request for @andrei.zubov
@andrei.zubov
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline will be started shortly.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for b544934e succeeds
mentioned in commit c74625d4
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label
added releasedcandidate label
mentioned in merge request kubitus-project/kubitus-installer!1646 (merged)
added devopsmanage label and removed 1 deleted label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label