Follow-up from "Support `license_scanning` in MR and Pipeline"
The following discussion from !23537 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@dosuken123 started a discussion: Can we remove this duplicated guard clause? See !23537 (diffs)
-
Ideally, we should check an actual job artifact object rather than just an object type, in order to make sure that a artifact for license management is persisted/returned correctly.
Edited by Tetiana Chupryna