Helm chart install page: start structural revisions

What does this MR do?

Now that !5030 (merged) is merged, let's start moving the subheadings into a more logical order. This MR modifies:

• Move ## Configuring GitLab Runner using the Helm Chart above the Install subheading, as it's essentially a long and complex prerequisite
• Handle subheadings of ## Configuring GitLab Runner using the Helm Chart:
  • blend child subheading ### Required configuration (child) back into it
  • move child subheading ### Additional configuration from H3 to H2, and bump those to the bottom of the page to get a cleaner flow through the major CRUD steps
  • because Additional configuration changed a H2, update the heading levels for the subheadings underneath
• Move ## Check available GitLab Runner Helm Chart versions from an H2 further down the page, to a H3 nested underneath Installing, because the Installing subheading ends with a description of selecting a chart version.
• Move ## Uninstalling GitLab Runner using the Helm Chart above all the additional configuration options, to keep the major parts of CRUD together.

Related issues

• Follow-up to Address line-level findings in Kubernetes insta... (!5030 - merged)
• Related to FY25Q3 TW OKR: Refactor high visibility pages f... (technical-writing#1075)

Author's checklist

• Optional. Consider taking the GitLab Technical Writing Fundamentals course.
• Follow the:
  • Documentation process.
  • Documentation guidelines.
  • Style Guide.
• If you're adding or changing the main heading of the page (H1), ensure that the product tier badge is added.
• If you are a GitLab team member, request a review based on:
  • The documentation page's metadata.
  • The associated Technical Writer.

If you are a GitLab team member and only adding documentation, do not add any of the following labels:

• ~"frontend"
• ~"backend"
• ~"type::bug"
• ~"database"

These labels cause the MR to be added to code verification QA issues.

Reviewer's checklist

Documentation-related MRs should be reviewed by a Technical Writer for a non-blocking review, based on Documentation Guidelines and the Style Guide.

If you aren't sure which tech writer to ask, use roulette or ask in the #docs Slack channel.

• If the content requires it, ensure the information is reviewed by a subject matter expert.
• Technical writer review items:
  • Ensure docs metadata is present and up-to-date.
  • Ensure the appropriate labels are added to this MR.
  • Ensure a release milestone is set.
  • If relevant to this MR, ensure content topic type principles are in use, including:
    • The headings should be something you'd do a Google search for. Instead of Default behavior, say something like Default behavior when you close an issue.
    • The headings (other than the page title) should be active. Instead of Configuring GDK, say something like Configure GDK.
    • Any task steps should be written as a numbered list.
    • If the content still needs to be edited for topic types, you can create a follow-up issue with the docs-technical-debt label.
• Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the above reviews. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review.