Poor UX with branch whose name is very long on Branches
What does this MR do?
Re-designs UX of branches by modifying HTML structures and CSS.
Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No. Note that a longer commit message line was not fully optimized, which is out of scope of this MR, as some fix affects other pages.
Why was this MR needed?
Because UI with a branch whose name is very long and/or whose last commit has a long commit message is broken on Branches. And to simplify HTML structure around it.
Screenshots (Version 2)
Cases | Images |
---|---|
PC | |
PC (narrower) | |
mobile | |
mobile (narrower) |
Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
-
Changelog entry added, if necessary - [n/a] Documentation created/updated
- [n/a] API support added
- [n/a] Tests added for this feature/bug
- Review
-
Has been reviewed by UX -
Has been reviewed by Frontend - [n/a] Has been reviewed by Backend
- [n/a] Has been reviewed by Database
-
-
Conform by the merge request performance guides -
Conform by the style guides -
Squashed related commits together - [n/a] Internationalization required/considered
- [n/a] End-to-end tests pass (
package-qa
manual pipeline job)
What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #44386 (closed)
Edited by Takuya Noguchi