Skip to content

Hide read_registry scope when registry is disabled on instance

What does this MR do?

Hides the read_registry scope when the internal registry is not enabled

Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Is there a better way to code the spec changes without doing the load? The actual fix here is clean and straightforward, but these spec changes make it feel like a hack. Eager to hear feedback here. Thanks!

Why was this MR needed?

We don't have the registry enabled on our instance. I think showing the read_registry option in this case is confusing to users.

Screenshots (if relevant)

Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

What are the relevant issue numbers?

Edited by Robin Bobbitt

Merge request reports