ci: add new services and tools to devvm ansible
What does this MR do?
This MR adds new services and tools to the devvm setup:
Valkey (Redis) Installation
- Install Valkey package (Redis-compatible key-value store)
- Add comprehensive configuration template (
valkey.conf.j2) - Configure to listen on service IP address
- Add handler for service restart
MinIO Client
- Build MinIO client (
mc) from source instead of using pre-built binary - Clone from GitHub and compile using Go
- Install binary to
/usr/local/bin/mc
Mise Tools Update
- Replace
mc@latestwithawscli@latestin mise tools - MinIO client is now built from source separately
GitLab APT Repositories
- Add GitLab EE repository and GPG key
- Add GitLab CE repository and GPG key
- Add GitLab Nightly Builds repository and GPG key
- Configure proper keyring permissions
Related to gitlab-org/maintainers/container-registry/placeholder#1 (closed)
Author checklist
- Assign one of conventional-commit prefixes to the MR.
-
fix: Indicates a bug fix, triggers a patch release. -
feat: Signals the introduction of a new feature, triggers a minor release. -
perf: Focuses on performance improvements that don't introduce new features or fix bugs, triggers a patch release. -
docs: Updates or changes to documentation. Does not trigger a release. -
style: Changes that do not affect the code's functionality. Does not trigger a release. -
refactor: Modifications to the code that do not fix bugs or add features but improve code structure or readability. Does not trigger a release. -
test: Changes related to adding or modifying tests. Does not trigger a release. -
chore: Routine tasks that don't affect the application, such as updating build processes, package manager configs, etc. Does not trigger a release. -
build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies. May trigger a release. -
ci: Modifications to continuous integration configuration files and scripts. Does not trigger a release. -
revert: Reverts a previous commit. It could result in a patch, minor, or major release.
-
-
MR contains database changes including schema/background migrations:
- Do not include code that depends on the schema migrations in the same commit. Split the MR into two or more.
- Do not include code that depends on background migrations in the same release.
- Manually run up and down migrations in a postgres.ai production database clone and add a link for the query plan(s) to the MR.
-
If adding new schema migrations make sure the
REGISTRY_SELF_MANAGED_RELEASE_VERSIONCI variable in migrate.yml is pointing to the latest GitLab self-managed released registry version. Find the correct registry version here. Make sure to select the branch of the latest GitLab release. -
If adding new queries, extract a query plan from postgres.ai and post the link here. If changing existing queries, also extract a query plan for the current version for comparison.
- I do not have access to postgres.ai and have made a comment on this MR asking for these to be run on my behalf.
- If adding new background migration, follow the guide for performance testing new background migrations and add a report/summary to the MR with your analysis.
- Change contains a breaking change - apply the breaking change label.
- Change is considered high risk - apply the label high-risk-change
-
I created or linked to an existing issue for every added or updated
TODO,BUG,FIXMEorOPTIMIZEprefixed comment -
Changes cannot be rolled back
- Apply the label cannot-rollback.
-
Add a section to the MR description that includes the following details:
- The reasoning behind why a release containing the presented MR can not be rolled back (e.g. schema migrations or changes to the FS structure)
- Detailed steps to revert/disable a feature introduced by the same change where a migration cannot be rolled back. (note: ideally MRs containing schema migrations should not contain feature changes.)
- Ensure this MR does not add code that depends on these changes that cannot be rolled back.
Documentation/resources
Reviewer checklist
- Ensure the commit and MR tittle are still accurate.
- If the change contains a breaking change, verify the breaking change label.
- If the change is considered high risk, verify the label high-risk-change
- Identify if the change can be rolled back safely. (note: all other reasons for not being able to rollback will be sufficiently captured by major version changes).
Edited by Pawel Rozlach