Draft: test(storage): replace legacy `gopkg.in/check.v1`
What does this MR do?
This MR cherry-picks and adapts the following upstream PR: https://github.com/distribution/distribution/pull/4185/files
Original commit message:
testing: replace legacy gopkg.in/check.v1
This commit replaces the legacy `gopkg.in/check.v1` testing dependency
with `github.com/stretchr/testify`.
Closes https://github.com/distribution/distribution/issues/3884.
Signed-off-by: Eng Zer Jun <engzerjun@gmail.com>
Related to Move driversuites away from check and onto testify (#433) • Hayley Swimelar • Backlog
Author checklist
-
Feature flags
-
Added feature flag: -
This feature does not require a feature flag
-
-
I added unit tests or they are not required -
I added documentation (or it's not required) -
I followed code review guidelines -
I followed Go Style guidelines -
For database changes including schema migrations: -
Manually run up and down migrations in a postgres.ai production database clone and post a screenshot of the result here. -
If adding new queries, extract a query plan from postgres.ai and post the link here. If changing existing queries, also extract a query plan for the current version for comparison. -
Do not include code that depends on the schema migrations in the same commit. Split the MR into two or more.
-
-
Ensured this change is safe to deploy to individual stages in the same environment ( cny
->prod
). State-related changes can be troublesome due to having parts of the fleet processing (possibly related) requests in different ways.
Reviewer checklist
-
Ensure the commit and MR tittle are still accurate. -
If the change contains a breaking change, apply the breaking change label. -
If the change is considered high risk, apply the label high-risk-change -
Identify if the change can be rolled back safely. (note: all other reasons for not being able to rollback will be sufficiently captured by major version changes).
If the MR introduces database schema migrations:
-
Ensure the commit and MR tittle start with fix:
,feat:
, orperf:
so that the change appears on the Changelog
If the changes cannot be rolled back follow these steps:
-
If not, apply the label cannot-rollback. -
Add a section to the MR description that includes the following details: -
The reasoning behind why a release containing the presented MR can not be rolled back (e.g. schema migrations or changes to the FS structure) -
Detailed steps to revert/disable a feature introduced by the same change where a migration cannot be rolled back. (note: ideally MRs containing schema migrations should not contain feature changes.) -
Ensure this MR does not add code that depends on these changes that cannot be rolled back.
-