Skip to content

Update "Assume Positive Intent" to address potential pitfalls with statement

Hailey Pobanz requested to merge Haileyrae-master-patch-74663 into master

Why is this change being made?

Based on this slack thread I started: https://gitlab.slack.com/archives/CLLDY3L8P/p1645080493905169

There are conversations across the professional community about the potential pitfalls of "assume positive intent" in company values. It has the potential to become a mechanism for people to not be held accountable for their actions or a way to excuse harmful behavior. I thought maybe adding “assume positive intent but address negative outcomes” would be a helpful way for us to address this.

POC and MIT opinions on "Assume Positive Intent" in workplace culture

Other articles and comments:

Author Checklist

  • Provided a concise title for the MR
  • Added a description to this MR explaining the reasons for the proposed change, per say-why-not-just-what
    • Copy/paste the Slack conversation to document it for later, or upload screenshots. Verify that no confidential data is added.
  • Assign reviewers for this change to the correct DRI(s)
    • If the DRI for the page/s being updated isn’t immediately clear, then assign it to one of the people listed in the "Maintained by" section in on the page being edited.
    • If your manager does not have merge rights, please ask someone to merge it AFTER it has been approved by your manager in #mr-buddies.
  • If the changes affect team members, or warrant an announcement in another way, please consider posting an update in #whats-happening-at-gitlab linking to this MR.
    • If this is a change that directly impacts the majority of global team members, it should be a candidate for #company-fyi. Please work with internal communications and check the handbook for examples.

Edited by Rebecca Spainhower

Merge request reports