Soften language and explain follow-up issue flow
Why is this change being made?
Following the discussions from gitlab-org/growth/team-tasks#64 (comment 289649030) and gitlab-org/growth/team-tasks#64 (comment 289635997).
Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
Conformity
-
Added description to this MR explaining the reasons for the proposed change, per say-why-not-just-what