[GPRD] Create unused Gitaly nodes to benchmark restoration time

Production Change

Change Summary

We'll be spinning up several Gitaly instances in GPRD to validate that our OS disk snapshot restore mechanism is working as intended and acquire benchmark timing data for restoration.

Change Details

1. Services Impacted - Gitaly
2. Change Technician - @mattmi
3. Change Reviewer - @cmcfarland
4. Time tracking - 120
5. Downtime Component - N/A

Set Maintenance Mode in GitLab

If your change involves scheduled maintenance, add a step to set and unset maintenance mode per our runbooks. This will make sure SLA calculations adjust for the maintenance period.

Detailed steps for the change

Change Steps - steps to take to execute the change

Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 100

• Set label changein-progress /label ~change::in-progress
• Merge this MR to spin up 15 Gitaly nodes in GPRD
• Wait for completion and collect timing data while using OS snapshots.
  • Time from "atlantis apply" to successful bootstrap.
  • Time spent only in the bootstrap script.
• Merge the branch to delete and recreate the nodes without using OS disk snapshots.
• Collect the same timing data from the new nodes.
  • See this note as to why this wasn't done.
• Remove the new nodes from config-mgmt for cleanup. MR
• Set label changecomplete /label ~change::complete

Rollback

Rollback steps - steps to be taken in the event of a need to rollback this change

Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - 20

• Remove the new nodes from the config-mgmt repository.
• Set label changeaborted /label ~change::aborted

Monitoring

Key metrics to observe

For this change we will be collecting data from the bootstrap script logs in /var/tmp/bootstrap*.log. There aren't any significant dashboard data sources related to this change.

Change Reviewer checklist

C4 C3 C2 C1:

• Check if the following applies:
  • The scheduled day and time of execution of the change is appropriate.
  • The change plan is technically accurate.
  • The change plan includes estimated timing values based on previous testing.
  • The change plan includes a viable rollback plan.
  • The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.

C2 C1:

• Check if the following applies:
  • The complexity of the plan is appropriate for the corresponding risk of the change. (i.e. the plan contains clear details).
  • The change plan includes success measures for all steps/milestones during the execution.
  • The change adequately minimizes risk within the environment/service.
  • The performance implications of executing the change are well-understood and documented.
  • The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
    • If not, is it possible (or necessary) to make changes to observability platforms for added visibility?
  • The change has a primary and secondary SRE with knowledge of the details available during the change window.
  • The change window has been agreed with Release Managers in advance of the change. If the change is planned for APAC hours, this issue has an agreed pre-change approval.
  • The labels blocks deployments and/or blocks feature-flags are applied as necessary.

Change Technician checklist

• Check if all items below are complete:
  • The change plan is technically accurate.
  • This Change Issue is linked to the appropriate Issue and/or Epic
  • Change has been tested in staging and results noted in a comment on this issue.
  • A dry-run has been conducted and results noted in a comment on this issue.
  • The change execution window respects the Production Change Lock periods.
  • For C1 and C2 change issues, the change event is added to the GitLab Production calendar.
  • For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call has been informed prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention @sre-oncall and this issue and await their acknowledgement.)
  • For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call provided approval with the eoc_approved label on the issue.
  • For C1 and C2 change issues, the Infrastructure Manager provided approval with the manager_approved label on the issue.
  • Release managers have been informed prior to any C1, C2, or blocks deployments change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention @release-managers and this issue and await their acknowledgment.)
  • There are currently no active incidents that are severity1 or severity2
  • If the change involves doing maintenance on a database host, an appropriate silence targeting the host(s) should be added for the duration of the change.