[db-benchmarking] PgBouncer upgrade
Production Change
Change Summary
We are upgrading PgBouncer to the current stable version and set optimized defaults for internal settings as well as certain OS tuning parameters.
On [db-benchmarking] we will enable all settings globally, restart the services and test the effect. On all other stages we will
- Enable the new settings for Registry
- Restart PgBouncer service gracefully
- Observe the effects
- Enable it globally
- Restart PgBouncer service gracefully on CI
- Observe
- Restart PgBouncer service gracefully on Main
- Observe
Change Details
- Services Impacted - ServicePatroniRegistry ServicePatroni ServiceAPI ServiceContainer Registry ServiceWeb ServicePostgres Database
- Change Technician - @alexander-sosna
- Change Reviewer - DRI for the review of this change
- Time tracking - Time, in minutes, needed to execute all change steps, including rollback
- Downtime Component - No Downtime!
Detailed steps for the change
Change Steps - steps to take to execute the change
Estimated Time to Complete (mins) - Estimated Time to Complete in Minutes
-
Set label changein-progress /label ~change::in-progress -
Merge MR for OS tuning in db-benchmarking: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/gl-infra/chef-repo/-/merge_requests/3698 -
Merge MR to use new version and configure it in db-benchmarking: [DB-BENCHMARKING] Upgrade pgBouncer to 1.19, tune backlog -
Do on the following hosts: pgbouncer-main-{01..03}-db-db-benchmarking.c.gitlab-db-benchmarking.internal-
Run Chef: chef-client -
Check sysctl values where changed root@pgbouncer-main-01-db-db-benchmarking.c.gitlab-db-benchmarking.internal:~# sysctl -a | grep port_range net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 10000 65535 -
Check new PgBouncer is installed : /usr/local/bin/pgbouncer --version PgBouncer 1.19.0 -
Restart PgBouncer and check status: systemctl restart pgbouncer; systemctl status pgbouncer -
Check service is running correct version root@pgbouncer-main-01-db-db-benchmarking.c.gitlab-db-benchmarking.internal:~# pgb-console psql (12.15 (Ubuntu 12.15-1.pgdg20.04+1), server 1.19.0/bouncer) ... pgbouncer=# SHOW VERSION; version ------------------ PgBouncer 1.19.0 (1 row)
-
-
Set label changecomplete /label ~change::complete
Rollback
We do not plan for a rollback, we will fix forward the procedure for GSTG.
Monitoring
Key metrics to observe
- Metric: Metric Name
- Location: Dashboard URL
- What changes to this metric should prompt a rollback: Describe Changes
Change Reviewer checklist
-
Check if the following applies: - The scheduled day and time of execution of the change is appropriate.
- The change plan is technically accurate.
- The change plan includes estimated timing values based on previous testing.
- The change plan includes a viable rollback plan.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
-
Check if the following applies: - The complexity of the plan is appropriate for the corresponding risk of the change. (i.e. the plan contains clear details).
- The change plan includes success measures for all steps/milestones during the execution.
- The change adequately minimizes risk within the environment/service.
- The performance implications of executing the change are well-understood and documented.
- The specified metrics/monitoring dashboards provide sufficient visibility for the change.
- If not, is it possible (or necessary) to make changes to observability platforms for added visibility?
- The change has a primary and secondary SRE with knowledge of the details available during the change window.
- The change window has been agreed with Release Managers in advance of the change. If the change is planned for APAC hours, this issue has an agreed pre-change approval.
- The labels blocks deployments and/or blocks feature-flags are applied as necessary.
Change Technician checklist
-
Check if all items below are complete: - The change plan is technically accurate.
- This Change Issue is linked to the appropriate Issue and/or Epic
- Change has been tested in staging and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- A dry-run has been conducted and results noted in a comment on this issue.
- The change execution window respects the Production Change Lock periods.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the change event is added to the GitLab Production calendar.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call has been informed prior to change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@sre-oncalland this issue and await their acknowledgement.) - For C1 and C2 change issues, the SRE on-call provided approval with the eoc_approved label on the issue.
- For C1 and C2 change issues, the Infrastructure Manager provided approval with the manager_approved label on the issue.
- Release managers have been informed prior to any C1, C2, or blocks deployments change being rolled out. (In #production channel, mention
@release-managersand this issue and await their acknowledgment.) - There are currently no active incidents that are severity1 or severity2
- If the change involves doing maintenance on a database host, an appropriate silence targeting the host(s) should be added for the duration of the change.
Edited by Alexander Sosna