Arizona detailed county analysis (Update Excess Votes: 2021-08-31)
Helping grassroot teams in Arizona focus on counties that have the most obvious issues.
Summary
Here is a list of counties to look at first. They are ranked by smallest population with the largest data discrepancies. (i.e. They should be the easiest counties to debunk)
- GILA
- APACHE
- NAVAJO
- COCHISE
- MOHAVE
- YAVAPAI
Note:
- The least populated counties have some anomalies but they are too small to really stand out. GILA is the first county with the least population to really stand out.
- The most populated counties are also ripe for inspection but due to their size, it may be harder for grassroot teams to get any traction there.
- All counties in AZ need to be forensically audited. They are all suspect.
- If teams need more specific information about a county. Please get in touch.
Guidelines
To get an accurate view of a county's results it is important to keep the big picture in mind, and account for trends:
- Across time
- Across counties in the same state
- Across counties with similar demographics (in different states)
- Across counties with similar population size (in different states)
Looking at one county in isolation, with just one snapshot in time can be very misleading.
The information we provide here is not conclusive in and of itself. It should be used as a guide to to help people focus their efforts on the most suspicious counties. Only a full forensic audits will allow us to really get to the bottom of all this.
Seth's color codes
It is important to note Seth does not believe green counties are clean. Rather he uses different colors to highlight the relative amount of fraud in each county.
He is trying to help people focus their efforts on the most obviously fraudulent counties and favors larger counties, since they have the greatest impact on the final state results.
At the end of the day, all the counties should be forensically audited.
Detailed explanations to follow.