Update chip to move it forward

• Updates language to be more formal in many places,
• added further clarification on risk and costs,
• included reference to repurposing by external actor if we do not enforce it.
• included historical information on usage,
• added a stakeholder section,
• added additional statements,
• updated the proposal details (unsure about quality, please review),
• set myself as co-owner (not sure if this is the right way, please review)

and probably a handful of more things I might've forgot.

Note that this is marked as draft and I'm requesting review since I am not a technical consensus / full node developer.

If I made some misstake, help me do it better and I'll update.

There is also at least one statement that I expect to update the text for (josh green) once I get a more clear statement to use.

Thanks, clear language. Much improved.

added 1 commit

• 37d9cd78 - reduce repetetive usage of the word code.

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 089d55a3 - Add additional copyright notice

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 07af788e - Fix incorrect reference to handling, to instead reference parsing.

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• fc5144a0 - Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 884d9792 - Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 3bdfb4c9 - Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 4328042f - Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 2760d6a6 - Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• ec6f184b - Simplify note about current state and include a clear list of valid numbers as...

Compare with previous version