java
3 unresolved threads
3 unresolved threads
Compare changes
+ 6
− 2
[auto-generated]
-
Duplicate Key Issue:
- The change of
SCOPE_KEY
to "dynamic" causes it to have the same value asDYNAMIC_KEY
. This will likely lead to confusion, potential errors, and unexpected behavior within the application since both keys will be indistinguishable.
- The change of
-
Typographical Error:
- In the JavaDoc comment for
DEFAULT_CLUSTER_STICKY
, you changed the reference from@see #CLUSTER_STICKY_KEY
to@see #CLUSTER_STICKY_KE
. This appears to be a typo and should be corrected back toCLUSTER_STICKY_KEY
.
- In the JavaDoc comment for
-
Inconsistent Version Naming:
- The addition of
RULE_VERSION_V31 = "v31";
introduces inconsistency in version naming. Previous versions are specified with a minor version (e.g., "v2.7" and "v3.0"). It would be more consistent to use "v3.1" instead of "v31".
- The addition of
-
Naming Convention for Constants:
- The newly added constant
DefaultRouteConditionSubSetWeight
does not follow the typical naming convention for constants in Java, which is all uppercase letters with underscores separating words (e.g.,DEFAULT_ROUTE_CONDITION_SUB_SET_WEIGHT
). Consider renaming it for consistency and clarity.
- The newly added constant
-
General Advice:
- Be cautious when modifying constants that may be used extensively throughout an application. Ensure thorough testing is conducted to identify any adverse impacts these changes might introduce, especially concerning duplicate key values and typographical errors.
-
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ public interface Constants {
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ public interface Constants {
@@ -138,4 +138,8 @@ public interface Constants {