[xonvote] #219 - banning a person from #xonotic (freenode) must run through xonvote (make a... (by matthiaskrgr)
xonvote created issue #1901 on 2014-02-13T10:09:33Z:
Poll 219 by matthiaskrgr
banning a person from #xonotic (freenode) must run through xonvote (make a vote whether to ban this person)
The poll passed with 5:4 majority. 12 users abstained the poll.
For details see: http://46.4.83.5:27500/poll/219
List of votes
Name | Vote | Comment |
---|---|---|
Archer— | abstain | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
Gatts | abstain | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
IDWMaster | abstain | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
JH0nny | abstain | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
Mario` | yes | |
Mirio | yes | Spammer need to go immediately. As for divVerents suggestion, maybe “vban ” instead of vcall and it would be limited to like ~3 days (further vote I guess) |
Morphed | yes | make ban instant and make vote to unban that person, if nobody cares, ban will stay |
MrBougo | no | Is there any reason to have this poll? I don’t want to have to wait 10 days to ban trolls, you can still call xonvotes to ban/unban people if you want. Looks to me like an overkill solution to a non-problem. |
Samual | no | Not all bans, but only controversial bans |
Soe1en | abstain | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
Sydes | abstain | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
bitbomb | abstain | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
detrate | abstain | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
dfdashh | abstain | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
divVerent | no | but yes if we get a fast way of doing this (e.g. ban first, call vote, if vote outcome tends towards no, already unban, and apply final judgement after end of vote) - or maybe 4 eyes system |
halogene | yes | |
matthiaskrgr | yes | |
s1lence | abstain | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
terencehill | abstain | |
ves | abstain | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
zykure | no | In line with div0 here |