KnownBugs - OutOfMemory
Wireshark will terminate if it runs out of memory and there's currently no solution (but some workarounds) to this.
We know this is a serious problem, but we can't do a lot about it (at least with the manpower we have). We would have to use a different GUI/platform toolkit and throw away 2/3 of the current Wireshark GUI code to completely solve this
Wireshark uses memory to store packet meta data (e.g. conversation and fragmentation related data) and to display this info on the screen.
How much memory is actually used depends on:
- the number of packets captured (well, depending on the capture duration and the network load on the line)
- the kind of packets captured (small/large packets, some packet types will lead to much more memory usage than others)
- the preference settings, e.g. the "TCP desegmentation" setting
In my experience (and with the capture files and Preference settings I'm usually working with), I need memory about ten times the actual capture file size. But again, this will largely depend on the things noted above.
The Performance page gives some hints how to reduce memory usage.
Why memory consumption is not a memory leak!
While dissecting packets, Wireshark needs a growing amount of memory for mainly two reasons:
- information in the packet list
- information that is kept in order to support more advanced protocol analysis, such as:
- conversation information so that dissection of a given packet can depend on prior packets
- reassembly of segmented packets
- sequence number analysis for TCP
- (there are probably many more such examples)
Wireshark cannot throw away this information as it might be required later; Wireshark keeps this information in memory until the capture file is closed.
So the more packets you load, the more memory you will need.
If you encounter problems that Wireshark is running out of memory, you can do the following:
Wireshark will use all memory it can get, this includes physical and virtual memory (swap disc/file space). You may increase the memory available, physical and/or swap disc/file size. However, swap space is much slower than physical memory.
Per-process resource limits may be in place. For example, 32-bit processes will, on most OS, only be able to use up to 4 Gbytes of memory, regardless of how much memory (including swap) the system has (see also some Windows-specific info on this below). Another example is FreeBSD 6.x which has a default limit of 524288KB on the data size of a single program running in memory. See the limits(1) man page for more information on viewing and changing this.
While capturing: If you're not doing an "Update list of packets in real time" capture, it shouldn't consume memory as it captures - although it *will* consume memory when you stop the capture and it reads it in, so that ultimately won't help. If you're just capturing data for later processing, you might try using dumpcap (although you might have to split the resulting file in order to read it into Wireshark, as per the next item).
Split the capture file into several smaller ones. This can be done while capturing using the "Use multiple files" setting in the capture options, or using the editcap command line tool. Switching to a new file while capturing won't release all memory (some memory leaks currently remain), but it will release a lot of it.
For processing multiple hours and/or days of data, refer to the attached document detailing an approach for using Wireshark to produce Network-Usage Baselines on multiple GBs of data. This was developed in June 2007 while performing network analysis on data which was captured using Wireshark. Using Wireshark to Create Network-Usage Baselines.pdf (10 June 2007)
If Wireshark is running out of memory, that probably means that you're letting it run for a very long time or you're analyzing very large capture files. You may find that another tool does what you want better than Wireshark. Use dumpcap for long term capturing, it's intended for this purpose, or see Tools for other tools which may be more suitable for the task.
Memory limitations on Microsoft Windows
The following is a summary of information from the MSDN: Large Memory Support and related pages.
Slightly simplified, the maximum physical memory windows supports:
|Windows Version||32 bit||64 bit|
|Various Server Versions||4-128GB||4GB-1TB|
Detailed information about the specific limits can be found at: Memory Limits for Windows Releases
More physical memory than the above limits will be ignored by windows.
Wireshark can be compiled as either a 32- or 64-bit application on Windows. The maximum amount of virtual memory Wireshark uses depends on several things:
- 32-bit application
- 64-bit application (of course only on 64-bit Windows):
- 8 TB RAM
Traditionally, a single program on windows can use up to 2GB RAM (the rest is used for Windows internal purposes). Since Wireshark Git commit 9fb143d5 (first released in 0.99.5) Wireshark/Tshark is linked with the /LARGEADDRESSAWARE switch that enables usage of up to 3GB/4GB RAM as described above.
XXX - I couldn't find any information about the maximum total amount of virtual memory for ALL processes in a system.
Enable the /3GB switch
For various Windows Server versions, XP Pro and Vista, the usage of 3GB for a single process can be activated by a change in the boot.ini file:
Remove file attributes of the file c:\boot.ini: c:\>attrib -s -h boot.ini
Edit boot.ini and append /3GB to the appropriate entry under [operating systems]
Add file attributes to the file c:\boot.ini again: c:\>attrib +s +h boot.ini
Now you should be able to use up to 3GB virtual memory with Wireshark.
Details at: 4-Gigabyte RAM Tuning
Background on termination when out of memory
Memory allocation is done using glib's g_malloc()/g_free() implementation. Unlike the common malloc() function, g_malloc() will terminate the program if it's runnning out of memory.
Many of the GLib (and GTK+) facilities that Wireshark uses, such as GHashTables, use g_malloc() too. So even if Wireshark were to use a different memory allocator, that wouldn't help if it continued to use those facilities.
Some effort is currently done to eliminate the usage of g_malloc() from the dissector code. Removing this from the GTK+ code will be almost impossible. However, most of the major consumers of memory are not in the GUI, so if we eliminate the use of GLib facilities that use g_malloc() (and make sure that we check for memory allocator failures, or use a memory allocator that throws an exception on failure and catch the exception and clean up!), that'll probably help somewhat.
- The notorious Wireshark “Out of Memory” problem, by Jasper Bongertz
Imported from https://wiki.wireshark.org/KnownBugs/OutOfMemory on 2020-08-11 23:15:52 UTC