Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
N
notes
Project
Project
Details
Activity
Releases
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Locked Files
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Service Desk
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Registry
Registry
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Soren
notes
Commits
9053814a
Verified
Commit
9053814a
authored
Nov 30, 2018
by
Soren
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Make some fixes to Physics
parent
1e6500e9
Pipeline
#38451501
passed with stage
in 58 seconds
Changes
3
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
3 changed files
with
63 additions
and
23 deletions
+63
-23
2018-08-29-Review.org
Physics Pre-AP/2018-08-29-Review.org
+7
-6
2018-08-30-Assessment.org
Physics Pre-AP/2018-08-30-Assessment.org
+18
-17
2018-11-29-Homework.org
Physics Pre-AP/2018-11-29-Homework.org
+38
-0
No files found.
Physics Pre-AP/2018-08-29-Review.org
View file @
9053814a
#+TITLE: Review
#+DATE: <2018-08-29 Wed>
#+AUTHOR: Soren
#+EMAIL: soren@
gallium
#+EMAIL: soren@
disroot.org
#+LANGUAGE: en
#+SELECT_TAGS: export
#+EXCLUDE_TAGS: noexport
#+CREATOR: Emacs 25.2.2 (Org mode 9.1.14)
#+LaTeX_HEADER: \usepackage{siunitx}
* Section Review [1.2]
...
...
@@ -18,7 +19,7 @@ The ruler can be placed or supported more effectively.
** Tools [19]
You find a micrometer (a tool used to measure objects to the
nearest
0.01 mm
) that has been badly bent. How would it compare
nearest
$0.01 \si{mm}$
) that has been badly bent. How would it compare
to a new, high quality meterstick in terms of its precision?
Its accuracy?
...
...
@@ -26,12 +27,12 @@ The bent micrometer would be more precise, but less accurate.
** Critical Thinking [23]
Your friend states in a report that the average time to circle a
1.5mi track was 65.414s. This was measured by timing 7 laps us
ing
a clock with a precision of 0.1s. How much confidence do you have
in the results of the report? Explain.
$1.5 \si{mi}$ track was $65.414 \si{s}$. This was measured by tim
ing
7 laps using a clock with a precision of $0.1 \si{s}$. How much
confidence do you have
in the results of the report? Explain.
Not much confidence:
1. There is human error in the timing measurements.
2. The data set is too small.
3. Not enough context is given and variables are not explained.
4.
65.414s is too precise for a 0.1s
precise timer.
4.
$65.414 \si{s}$ is too precise for a $0.1 \si{s}$
precise timer.
Physics Pre-AP/2018-08-30-Assessment.org
View file @
9053814a
#+TITLE:
30-08-2018-
Assessment
#+TITLE: Assessment
#+DATE: <2018-08-30 Thu>
#+AUTHOR: Soren
#+EMAIL: soren@
gallium
#+EMAIL: soren@
disroot.org
#+LANGUAGE: en
#+SELECT_TAGS: export
#+EXCLUDE_TAGS: noexport
#+CREATOR: Emacs 25.2.2 (Org mode 9.1.14)
#+LaTeX_HEADER: \usepackage{siunitx}
* Chapter 1 Assessment
** Mathematics and Physics [67]
Convert each of the following measurements to meters:
- $42.3 \
text{cm}$ :: $100 \text{cm} = 1 \text
{m}$,
$42.3 \
text{cm} = 0.423 \text
{m}$.
- $6.2 \
text{pm}$ :: $1 \text{pm} = 1000000000000000 \text
{m}$,
$6.2 \
text{pm} = 6200000000000 \text
{m}$.
- $21 \
text{km}$ :: $1 \text{km} = 1000 \text
{m}$,
$21 \
text{km} = 21000 \text
{m}$.
- $
0.023 \text{mm}$ :: $1000 \text{mm} = 1 \text
{m}$,
$
0.023 \text{mm} = 0.000023 \text
{m}$.
- $214 \
text{µm}$ :: $1000000 \text{µm} = 1 \text
{m}$,
$214 \
text{µm} = 0.000214 \text
{m}$.
- $57 \
text{nm}$ :: $1000000000 \text{nm} = 1 \text
{m}$,
$57 \
text{nm} = 0.000000057 \text
{m}$.
- $42.3 \
si{cm}$ :: $100 \si{cm} = 1 \si
{m}$,
$42.3 \
si{cm} = \num{4.23d-1} \si
{m}$.
- $6.2 \
si{pm}$ :: $1 \si{pm} = \num{1d15} \si
{m}$,
$6.2 \
si{pm} = \num{6.2d15} \si
{m}$.
- $21 \
si{km}$ :: $1 \si{km} = \num{1d3} \si
{m}$,
$21 \
si{km} = \num{21d3} \si
{m}$.
- $
\num{2.3d-2} \si{mm}$ :: $\num{1d3} \si{mm} = 1 \si
{m}$,
$
\num{2.3d-2} \si{mm} = \num{2.3d-6} \si
{m}$.
- $214 \
si{µm}$ :: $\num{1d6} \si{µm} = 1 \si
{m}$,
$214 \
si{µm} = \num{2.14d-5} \si
{m}$.
- $57 \
si{nm}$ :: $\num{1d9} \si{nm} = 1 \si
{m}$,
$57 \
si{nm} = \num{5.7d-9} \si
{m}$.
** Measurement [75]
A water tank has a mass of
3.64 kg
when it is empty and a mass
sf 51.8 kg
when it is filled to a certain level. What is the
A water tank has a mass of
$3.64 \si{kg}$
when it is empty and a mass
of $51.8 \si{kg}$
when it is filled to a certain level. What is the
mass of the water in the tank?
$51.8 \
text{kg} - 3.64 \text{kg} = 48.16 \text
{kg}$.
$51.8 \
si{kg} - 3.64 \si{kg} = 48.16 \si
{kg}$.
** Measurement [79]
Give the measure shown in *Figure 1-24* (Class A scale pointing
...
...
Physics Pre-AP/2018-11-29-Homework.org
0 → 100644
View file @
9053814a
#+TITLE: Homework
#+DATE: <2018-11-29 Thu>
#+AUTHOR: Soren
#+EMAIL: soren@disroot.org
#+LANGUAGE: en
#+SELECT_TAGS: export
#+EXCLUDE_TAGS: noexport
#+CREATOR: Emacs 26.1 (Org mode 9.1.9)
#+LaTeX_HEADER: \usepackage{siunitx}
* Section Review [6.2]
** [12]
A runner moving at the speed of 8.8 m/s rounds a bend with a radius
of 25 m. What is the centripetal acceleration of the runner, and
what agent exerts force on the runner?
\begin{align}
a &= \frac{V^{2}}{r} \\
a &= \frac{77.44 \si{m^{2}/s^{2}}}{25 \si{m}} \\
a &= 3.1 \si{m/s^{2}}
\end{align}
This acceleration is due to a friction force from the ground.
** [14]
An airplane traveling at $201 \si{m/s}$ makes a turn. What is the
smallest radius of the circular path (in $\si{km}$) that the pilot
can make and keep the centripetal acceleration under
$5.0 \si{m/s^{2}}$?
\begin{align}
r &\geq \frac{V^{2}}{a} \\
r &\geq \frac{40401 \si{m^{2}/s^{2}}}{5 \si{m/s^{2}}} \\
r &\geq 8080.2 \si{m} \\
r &\geq 8.08 \si{km}
\end{align}
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment