GitLab

This Document was drafted, proposed, and voted on
at the Snowdrift Community Forum:
https://community.snowdrift.coop/t/team-agreements-proposal/1463/10

This process was withdrawn by its own mechanism:

> Driver: This async consent decision process is not working for us. We need a simpler process to start with and to iterate from there.
>
> Proposal: Drop the current process entirely and make important all-team decisions in synchronous meetings; only add new formality if there is a clear need. We should still work with clear driver statements in order to understand the purpose of any proposal.

Discussion at
https://community.snowdrift.coop/t/proposal-drop-burdensome-forum-based-consent-process/1558

This reverts commit b320e541.

The file system is not for version control; that's git's job.

fixed broken link to https://patterns.sociocracy30.org/objection.html using archive.org. an active alternative might be https://patterns.sociocracy30.org/test-arguments-qualify-as-objections.html

mentioning canned replies
some minor format changes
some editorial tweaks

Reviewing the process for consent decisions

See merge request !18

This is done in the anticipation that polls are going to be removed from
the process.  "Consent decision process" is a name that was used for the
process before, see the forum.

Resolve "raise branding and visionary to the Main circle"

Closes #17

See merge request !16

Also some visual cleanup:
- no blank lines between bullets
- no line breaks to respect 80 characters (let them soft wrap)

Introduce website circle policy changelog

See merge request sd/governance!15

No links for Leads, Gen Manager is a type of Lead

it was removed from the circle but not yet from README

part of footnote was not included in footnote (oops)

Sysadmin really as is doesn't fit the other circles at all, we can
adjust later, this is best for-now

Lead is just a generic for all circles (and that's defined separately
now). The assignments are still in the README. No need to show the entry
in each circle doc.

This was premature to just do, opening an issue instead