1. 10 Nov, 2018 1 commit
  2. 01 Nov, 2018 1 commit
  3. 31 Oct, 2018 10 commits
  4. 30 Oct, 2018 25 commits
  5. 29 Oct, 2018 3 commits
    • Release Manager's avatar
      Trac #26590: py3: all tests pass in combinat/words · 551f60f1
      Release Manager authored
      {{{
      ./sage -btp --long src/sage/combinat/words
      }}}
      
      Before (with 8.5.beta1):
      {{{
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      sage -t abstract_word.py  # 1 doctest failed
      sage -t morphism.py  # 7 doctests failed
      sage -t finite_word.py  # 4 doctests failed
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      }}}
      
      After (with this branch):
      {{{
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      All tests passed!
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      }}}
      
      The failures in `finite_word.py` were due to #26591.
      
      URL: https://trac.sagemath.org/26590
      Reported by: slabbe
      Ticket author(s): Sébastien Labbé
      Reviewer(s): Frédéric Chapoton
      551f60f1
    • Release Manager's avatar
      Trac #26576: py3: Fix issues in sage/rings/padics · f770b7fb
      Release Manager authored
      URL: https://trac.sagemath.org/26576
      Reported by: roed
      Ticket author(s): David Roe
      Reviewer(s): Frédéric Chapoton
      f770b7fb
    • Release Manager's avatar
      Trac #3330: multivariate polynomial GCD should work over more base rings · 7d0baebb
      Release Manager authored
      Consider this example:
      {{{
        R.<a,b> = NumberField(x^2-3,'g').extension(x^2-7,'h')[]
        h = R.base_ring().gen()
        S.<y> = R.fraction_field()[]
        xgcd(y^2, a*h*y+b)
      }}}
      (reported by Gaëtan Bisson here: http://groups.google.com/group/sage-sup
      port/browse_thread/thread/5338608bd7508b00/cd1d6555592e472f#cd1d6555592e
      472f)
      
      This fails because Sage attempts to find the GCD of multivariate
      polynomials over a relative number field using Singular, and Singular
      does not support relative number fields.  This should be implemented in
      Sage (probably by converting the relative number field into an absolute
      field, performing the computation, and converting back).
      
      See also #3329, which is about the exact same test case, but requests
      only a better error message.
      
      URL: https://trac.sagemath.org/3330
      Reported by: cwitty
      Ticket author(s): Thierry Monteil
      Reviewer(s): Vincent Delecroix
      7d0baebb