Change usage of "audited" tag
The current usage of the audited
tag is a bit misleading. It reads as a blanked approval that projects that have been audited are better than ones that have not. This is not always the case, especially where audits find issues. The tag usage needs to be some kind of gradated scale. Obviously badly funking an audit is likely grounds from removal from our recommendations entirely, so we don't need a "failed" category, but some kind of status variants like "audit:none", "audit:no-issues", and "audit:caveats" would be less misleading that just "audited".
Alternatively maybe dropping the tag entirely and just linking to audit results if any would be less misleading.