Commit a5d6d3a1 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by Paul E. McKenney

softirq: A single rcu_bh_qs() call per softirq set is enough

Calling rcu_bh_qs() after every softirq action is not really needed.
What RCU needs is at least one rcu_bh_qs() per softirq round to note a
quiescent state was passed for rcu_bh.

Note for Paul and myself : this could be inlined as a single instruction
and avoid smp_processor_id()
(sone this_cpu_write(rcu_bh_data.passed_quiesce, 1))
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett's avatarJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
parent fa07a58f
......@@ -232,7 +232,6 @@ asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
bool in_hardirq;
__u32 pending;
int softirq_bit;
int cpu;
/*
* Mask out PF_MEMALLOC s current task context is borrowed for the
......@@ -247,7 +246,6 @@ asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
__local_bh_disable_ip(_RET_IP_, SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
in_hardirq = lockdep_softirq_start();
cpu = smp_processor_id();
restart:
/* Reset the pending bitmask before enabling irqs */
set_softirq_pending(0);
......@@ -276,11 +274,11 @@ asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
prev_count, preempt_count());
preempt_count_set(prev_count);
}
rcu_bh_qs(cpu);
h++;
pending >>= softirq_bit;
}
rcu_bh_qs(smp_processor_id());
local_irq_disable();
pending = local_softirq_pending();
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment