Commit 4a152c39 authored by Linus Torvalds's avatar Linus Torvalds

Merge tag 'pm+acpi-4.1-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm

Pull power management and ACPI fixes from Rafael Wysocki:
 "Three regression fixes this time, one for a recent regression in the
  cpuidle core affecting multiple systems, one for an inadvertently
  added duplicate typedef in ACPICA that breaks compilation with GCC 4.5
  and one for an ACPI Smart Battery Subsystem driver regression
  introduced during the 3.18 cycle (stable-candidate).

  Specifics:

   - Fix for a regression in the cpuidle core introduced by one of the
     recent commits in the clockevents_notify() removal series that put
     a call to a function which had to be executed with disabled
     interrupts into a code path running with enabled interrupts (Rafael
     J Wysocki)

   - Fix for a build problem in ACPICA (with GCC 4.5) introduced by one
     of the recent ACPICA tools commits that added a duplicate typedef
     to one of the ACPICA's header files by mistake (Olaf Hering)

   - Fix for a regression in the ACPI SBS (Smart Battery Subsystem)
     driver introduced during the 3.18 development cycle causing the
     smart battery manager to be marked as not present when it should be
     marked as present (Chris Bainbridge)"

* tag 'pm+acpi-4.1-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
  cpuidle: Run tick_broadcast_exit() with disabled interrupts
  ACPI / SBS: Enable battery manager when present
  ACPICA: remove duplicate u8 typedef
parents 5a2e73b2 50904a7d
......@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ static int acpi_sbs_add(struct acpi_device *device)
if (!sbs_manager_broken) {
result = acpi_manager_get_info(sbs);
if (!result) {
sbs->manager_present = 0;
sbs->manager_present = 1;
for (id = 0; id < MAX_SBS_BAT; ++id)
if ((sbs->batteries_supported & (1 << id)))
acpi_battery_add(sbs, id);
......
......@@ -158,9 +158,18 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
int entered_state;
struct cpuidle_state *target_state = &drv->states[index];
bool broadcast = !!(target_state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP);
ktime_t time_start, time_end;
s64 diff;
/*
* Tell the time framework to switch to a broadcast timer because our
* local timer will be shut down. If a local timer is used from another
* CPU as a broadcast timer, this call may fail if it is not available.
*/
if (broadcast && tick_broadcast_enter())
return -EBUSY;
trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(index, dev->cpu);
time_start = ktime_get();
......@@ -169,6 +178,13 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
time_end = ktime_get();
trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, dev->cpu);
if (broadcast) {
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled()))
local_irq_disable();
tick_broadcast_exit();
}
if (!cpuidle_state_is_coupled(dev, drv, entered_state))
local_irq_enable();
......
......@@ -123,7 +123,6 @@
#ifndef ACPI_USE_SYSTEM_INTTYPES
typedef unsigned char u8;
typedef unsigned char u8;
typedef unsigned short u16;
typedef short s16;
......
......@@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
struct cpuidle_device *dev = __this_cpu_read(cpuidle_devices);
struct cpuidle_driver *drv = cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev);
int next_state, entered_state;
unsigned int broadcast;
bool reflect;
/*
......@@ -150,17 +149,6 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
goto exit_idle;
}
broadcast = drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP;
/*
* Tell the time framework to switch to a broadcast timer
* because our local timer will be shutdown. If a local timer
* is used from another cpu as a broadcast timer, this call may
* fail if it is not available
*/
if (broadcast && tick_broadcast_enter())
goto use_default;
/* Take note of the planned idle state. */
idle_set_state(this_rq(), &drv->states[next_state]);
......@@ -174,8 +162,8 @@ static void cpuidle_idle_call(void)
/* The cpu is no longer idle or about to enter idle. */
idle_set_state(this_rq(), NULL);
if (broadcast)
tick_broadcast_exit();
if (entered_state == -EBUSY)
goto use_default;
/*
* Give the governor an opportunity to reflect on the outcome
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment